Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):855.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05198-6.

Prediction of stillbirth low resource setting in Northern Uganda

Affiliations

Prediction of stillbirth low resource setting in Northern Uganda

Silvia Awor et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Women of Afro-Caribbean and Asian origin are more at risk of stillbirths. However, there are limited tools built for risk-prediction models for stillbirth within sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, we examined the predictors for stillbirth in low resource setting in Northern Uganda.

Methods: Prospective cohort study at St. Mary's hospital Lacor in Northern Uganda. Using Yamane's 1967 formula for calculating sample size for cohort studies using finite population size, the required sample size was 379 mothers. We doubled the number (to > 758) to cater for loss to follow up, miscarriages, and clients opting out of the study during the follow-up period. Recruited 1,285 pregnant mothers at 16-24 weeks, excluded those with lethal congenital anomalies diagnosed on ultrasound. Their history, physical findings, blood tests and uterine artery Doppler indices were taken, and the mothers were encouraged to continue with routine prenatal care until the time for delivery. While in the delivery ward, they were followed up in labour until delivery by the research team. The primary outcome was stillbirth 24 + weeks with no signs of life. Built models in RStudio. Since the data was imbalanced with low stillbirth rate, used ROSE package to over-sample stillbirths and under-sample live-births to balance the data. We cross-validated the models with the ROSE-derived data using K (10)-fold cross-validation and obtained the area under curve (AUC) with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

Results: The incidence of stillbirth was 2.5%. Predictors of stillbirth were history of abortion (aOR = 3.07, 95% CI 1.11-8.05, p = 0.0243), bilateral end-diastolic notch (aOR = 3.51, 95% CI 1.13-9.92, p = 0.0209), personal history of preeclampsia (aOR = 5.18, 95% CI 0.60-30.66, p = 0.0916), and haemoglobin 9.5 - 12.1 g/dL (aOR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.93, p = 0.0375). The models' AUC was 75.0% with 68.1% accuracy, 69.1% sensitivity and 67.1% specificity.

Conclusion: Risk factors for stillbirth include history of abortion and bilateral end-diastolic notch, while haemoglobin of 9.5-12.1 g/dL is protective.

Keywords: Africa; Prediction models; Risk factors; Stillbirth; Uganda.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Figures

Fig1
Fig1
Participant flow through the study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems ICD10. In: ICD10. vol. 10, 5TH edn. online: WHO; 2010.
    1. Definition of Stillbirth. Proc R Soc Med 1913, 6(Obstet Gynaecol Sect):64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cartlidge PH, Stewart JH. Effect of changing the stillbirth definition on evaluation of perinatal mortality rates. Lancet. 1995;346(8973):486–488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91327-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robert K. Creasy, Robert Resnik, Jay D. Iams, Charles J. Lookwood, Thomas R. Moore, Greene MF: Creasy and Resnik's maternal-fetal medicine, Principles and practice, 7th edn: Elsevier Saunders; 2014.
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, Hogan D, Shiekh S, Qureshi ZU, You D, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98–e108. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2. - DOI - PubMed