Pearls, pitfalls, and surgical indications of the Intuity TM heart valve: A rapid deployment bioprosthesis. A systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 36403259
- DOI: 10.1111/jocs.17231
Pearls, pitfalls, and surgical indications of the Intuity TM heart valve: A rapid deployment bioprosthesis. A systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Objectives: To highlight short- and long-term clinical outcomes of the Intuity TM rapid deployment prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement.
Methods: We reviewed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, SciELO, LILACS, CCTR/CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for clinical trials, retrospective clinical studies, meta-analysis, and gray literature.
Results: Fourty-five clinical studies with 12.714 patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-day mortality ranged from 3.8% for Intuity and 3.9% for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The incidence of paravalvular leak (PVL) (Intuity 0% and TAVR 2.17%), permanent pacemaker implantation (Intuity 11.11% and TAVR 12.5%), stroke (Intuity 2.2% and TAVR 2.6%), myocardial infarction (MI) (Intuity 0% and TAVR 1%), were all higher in the TAVR group. Compared to other sutured bioprosthesis (SB), mortality ranged from 0% to 3.9% for Intuity and 0%-6.9% for SB. Long-term cardiac mortality ranged from 0.9% to 1.55% for Intuity and 1.4%-3.3% for the Perceval valve. The incidence of PVL (Intuity 0.24%-0.7% and Perceval 0%-1%), endocarditis (Intuity 0.2%-0.7% and Perceval 1.6%-6.6%), stroke (Intuity 0.36%-1.4% and Perceval 0%-0.8%), MI (Intuity 0.07%-0.26%), and SVD (Intuity 0.12%-0.7% and Perceval 0%) were comparable. Compared to standard full sternotomy (SFS), minimally invasive surgery (MINV) mortality ranged from 0% to 4.3% for MINV and 0%-2.1% for SFS. Hospital costs outcomes ranged from $37,187-$44,368 for the Intuity, $69,389 for TAVR, and $13,543 for SB. Intuity short-term mortality ranged between 0.9% and 12.4% while long-term mortality ranged between 2.6% and 20%.
Conclusions: This manuscript provides a 360° overview of the current rapid deployments, sutureless, and TAVR prosthesis.
Keywords: Intuity; TAVR; aortic valve; echocardiography; long-term outcomes; perceval; rapid-deployment; sutured valves.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Borger MA, Moustafine V, Conradi L, et al. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(1):17-25. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.022
-
- Kocher AA, Laufer G, Haverich A, et al. One-year outcomes of the surgical treatment of aortic stenosis with a next generation surgical aortic valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY valve system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):110-116. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.108
-
- ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier. Surgical treatment of aortic stenosis with a next generation, rapid deployment surgical aortic valve deployment surgical aortic valve: NCT0 1700439.
-
- Lorusso R, Jiritano F, Roselli E, et al. Perioperative platelet reduction after sutureless or stented valve implantation: results from the PERSIST-AVR controlled randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60(6):1359-1365. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezab175
-
- Dokollari A, Ramlawi B, Torregrossa G, et al. Benefits and pitfalls of the perceval sutureless bioprosthesis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;8:5. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.789392
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources