Validity of the Brazilian pediatric triage system CLARIPED at a secondary level of emergency care
- PMID: 36403739
- PMCID: PMC10202729
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.10.005
Validity of the Brazilian pediatric triage system CLARIPED at a secondary level of emergency care
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the validity of the triage system CLARIPED in a pediatric population in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.
Methods: Prospective, observational study in a secondary-level pediatric emergency service from Sep-2018 to Ago-2019. A convenience sample of all patients aged 0-18 years triaged by the computerized CLARIPED system was selected. Associations between urgency levels and patient outcomes were analyzed to assess construct validity. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) to identify the most urgent patients were estimated, as well as under-triage and over-triage rates.
Results: The distribution of 24,338 visits was: RED 0.02%, ORANGE 0.9%, YELLOW 23.5%, GREEN 47.9%, and BLUE 27.7% (highest to the lowest level of urgency). The frequency of the following outcomes increased with increasing urgency: hospital admission (0.0%, 0.02%, 0.1%, 7.1% and 20%); stay in ED observation room (1.9%, 2,4%, 4.8%, 24.1%, 60%); use of ≥ 2 diagnostic/therapeutic resources (2.3%, 3.0%, 5.9%, 28.8%, 40%); ED length of stay (12, 12, 15, 99.5, 362 min). The most urgent patients (RED, ORANGE, and YELLOW) exhibited higher chances of using ≥ 2 resources (OR 2.55; 95%CI: 2.23-2.92) or of being hospitalized (OR 23.9; 95%CI: 7.17-79.62), compared to the least urgent (GREEN and BLUE). The sensitivity to identify urgency was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.70-0.98); specificity, 0.76 (95%CI: 0.75-0.76); NPV, 0.99 (95%CI: 0.99-1.00); overtriage rate, 23.0%, and undertriage, 11.5%.
Conclusion: This study corroborates the validity and safety of CLARIPED, demonstrating significant correlations with clinical outcomes, good sensitivity, and low undertriage rate in a secondary-level Brazilian pediatric emergency service.
Keywords: Emergency care; Pediatric; Triage; Validity.
Copyright © 2022 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Hohenhaus S.M., Travers D., Mecham N. Pediatric triage: a review of emergency education literature. J Emerg Nurs. 2008;34:308–313. - PubMed
-
- Magalhães-Barbosa M.C., Robaina J.R., Prata-Barbosa A., Lopes C.S. Validity of triage systems for paediatric emergency care: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2017;34:711–719. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical