Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;29(8):3136-3151.
doi: 10.1111/odi.14447. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

Disease severity scoring systems in mucosal lichen planus: A systematic review

Affiliations

Disease severity scoring systems in mucosal lichen planus: A systematic review

Sreedevi P Unnikrishnan et al. Oral Dis. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Several scoring systems have been developed to evaluate disease severity in mucosal lichen planus, but only a few have been validated to ensure reproducible and accurate assessment of disease severity. The current systematic review was undertaken to identify clinical severity scoring systems in mucosal lichen planus that have undergone validity or reliability testing and to describe their operating characteristics. We performed a bibliographic search in five databases from their inception to October 2022 for severity scoring systems in mucosal lichen planus that have undergone validity or reliability tests. Quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. We have included 118 studies and identified 11 clinical severity scoring systems for oral lichen planus that have undergone validity or reliability testing. Of these, the most reported were the Thongprasom score, the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) and the REU (Reticular/hyperkeratotic, Erosive/erythematous, Ulcerative) scoring systems. We did not identify clinical scoring systems for extraoral mucosal lichen planus that have undergone validity or reliability testing. The ODSS and REU scoring systems have undergone the highest number of validation attempts and reliability assessments for oral lichen planus respectively. However, we have identified numerous factors that have hampered the universal adoption of a standardised scoring system. There is a need for the development and validation of scoring systems for extraoral mucosal lichen planus.

Keywords: clinical scoring systems; mucosal lichen planus; oral lichen planus; reliability; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Agha-Hosseini, F., Borhan-Mojabi, K., Monsef-Esfahani, H. R., Mirzaii-Dizgah, I., Etemad-Moghadam, S., & Karagah, A. (2010). Efficacy of purslane in the treatment of oral lichen planus. Phytotherapy Research, 24(2), 240-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2919
    1. Andreasen, J. 0, & Copenhagen, D. D. S. (1968). Oral lichen planus I. a clinical evaluation of 115 cases. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 31-42, 25.
    1. Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (Eds.). (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01
    1. Chainani-Wu, N., Silverman, S., Reingold, A., Bostrom, A., Lozada-Nur, F., & Weintraub, J. (2008). Validation of instruments to measure the symptoms and signs of oral lichen planus. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 105(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.022
    1. Chainani-Wu, N., Silverman, S., Reingold, A., Bostrom, A., Mc Culloch, C., Lozada-Nur, F., & Weintraub, J. (2007). A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of curcuminoids in oral lichen planus. Phytomedicine, 14(7-8), 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2007.05.003

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources