Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 20;4(1):58.
doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00209-5.

Modulation of gut microbiota, blood metabolites, and disease resistance by dietary β-glucan in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Affiliations

Modulation of gut microbiota, blood metabolites, and disease resistance by dietary β-glucan in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Simon Menanteau-Ledouble et al. Anim Microbiome. .

Abstract

Background: Prebiotics are known to have a positive impact on fish health and growth rate, and β-glucans are among the most used prebiotics on the market. In this study, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were treated with a β-1,3;1,6-glucan dietary supplement (at a dose of 0 g, 1 g, 10 g, and 50 g β-glucan per kg of feed). After 6 weeks, the effect of the β-glucan was evaluated by determining the changes in the microbiota and the blood serum metabolites in the fish. The impact of β-glucan on the immune system was evaluated through a challenge experiment with the bacterial fish pathogen Yersinia ruckeri.

Results: The microbiota showed a significant change in terms of composition following β-glucan treatment, notably an increase in the relative abundance of members of the genus Aurantimicrobium, associated with a decreased abundance of the genera Carnobacterium and Deefgea. Furthermore, analysis of more than 200 metabolites revealed that the relative levels of 53 metabolites, in particular compounds related to phosphatidylcholines, were up- or downregulated in response to the dietary supplementation, this included the amino acid alanine that was significantly upregulated in the fish that had received the highest dose of β-glucan. Meanwhile, no strong effect could be detected on the resistance of the fish to the bacterial infection.

Conclusions: The present study illustrates the ability of β-glucans to modify the gut microbiota of fish, resulting in alteration of the metabolome and affecting fish health through the lipidome of rainbow trout.

Keywords: Gut microbiota; Metabolite response; Oncorhynchus mykiss; Prebiotic; β-glucan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Alpha diversity measured in Chao1. W0: Diversity for control week 0. W6: Diversity for control week 6. 0.1%: Diversity for microbiota treated with 0.1% β-glucan. 1.0%: Diversity for microbiota treated with 1.0% β-glucan. 5.0%: Diversity for microbiota treated with 5.0% β-glucan
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Heatmap showing the relative abundance in term of sequence reads for the 20 most abundant bacterial genera in the intestines of the fish receiving the different concentration of β-glucan and the control groups. Individual numbers on the heatmap indicate the relative abundance of each genus
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Redundancy analysis plot illustrating the composition of the microbiota in the intestine of the fish at week 6, constrained based on the concentration of β-glucan in the diet. Percentages in the axis indicate the percentage of the total variation explained by the treatment group; followed by the effect of this axis on the total variation between samples
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Heatmap showing the relative abundance of the serum’s metabolites compared to the control at week 6 (W6- 0.0% β-glucan) using pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Only samples that are significantly different from the control are shown and the colour of the square indicates the intensity of the change. A: LC samples. B: FIA samples
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Clearance of Y. ruckeri among experimentally infected fish shown as the prevalence of Y. ruckeri among the groups. Sampling size (n) was 10, 20, 20, 30 fish per group at 3, 14, 21, and 28 days p.i., respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020. Rome: FAO; 2020. 10.4060/ca9229en.
    1. O’Neil J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. 2016.
    1. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghanei-Motlagh R, Gharibi D, Mohammadian T, Khosravi M, Mahmoudi E, Zarea M, et al. Feed supplementation with quorum quenching probiotics with anti-virulence potential improved innate immune responses, antioxidant capacity and disease resistance in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) Aquaculture. 2021;535:736345. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736345. - DOI
    1. Ghanei-Motlagh R, Mohammadian T, Gharibi D, Menanteau-Ledouble S, Mahmoudi E, Khosravi M, et al. Quorum quenching properties and probiotic potentials of intestinal associated bacteria in Asian sea bass Lates calcarifer. Mar Drugs. 2019;18:23. doi: 10.3390/md18010023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources