Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;28(2):397-438.
doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12631. Epub 2022 Nov 20.

Utility of temporal self-regulation theory in health and social behaviours: A meta-analysis

Indita Dorina  1   2   3 , Barbara Mullan  1   2   3 , Mark Boyes  1 , Caitlin Liddelow  2   4
Affiliations
Review

Utility of temporal self-regulation theory in health and social behaviours: A meta-analysis

Indita Dorina et al. Br J Health Psychol. 2023 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Temporal self-regulation theory was developed to address an observed intention-behaviour gap across behaviours. However, a synthesis of studies has not yet been conducted to investigate the theory's utility to explain behaviour and bridge the intention-behaviour gap. This review aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of temporal self-regulation theory to understanding behaviour and pre-registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021253174).

Method: Forward citation searches on the original theory publication through Google Scholar until May 2021 identified 37 eligible articles, including, 12,555 participants assessing at least two of the three theory constructs. Random-effects meta-analyses assessed the strength of associations between theory constructs on behaviour and random effects meta-regressions assessed moderators of behaviour.

Results: Findings provide support for temporal self-regulation theory to explain behaviour with very weak (self-regulatory capacity r = .039, CI = .00, -.07) to moderate (intention r = .331, CI = .26, .40; behavioural pre-potency r = .379, CI = .32, .44) effect sizes. Further, the strength of associations varied across behaviour types and contexts. However, there was high heterogeneity across studies and some moderating effects could not be assessed due to insufficient numbers of studies assessing interactions.

Conclusions: We urge researchers to assess and report interactions for better understanding of the drivers of behaviour to develop effective interventions for positive behaviour change.

Keywords: health behaviour; intention-behaviour gap; meta-analysis; social behaviour; temporal self-regulation theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
    1. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
    1. *Allan, J. L., Johnston, M., & Campbell, N. (2010). Unintentional eating. What determines goal-incongruent chocolate consumption? Appetite, 54(2), 422-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.009
    1. *Allom, V., & Mullan, B. (2012). Self-regulation versus habit: The influence of self-schema on fruit and vegetable consumption. Psychology & Health, 27(sup2), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.605138
    1. *Allom, V., Mullan, B., & Sebastian, J. (2013). Closing the intention-behaviour gap for sunscreen use and sun protection behaviours. Psychology & Health, 28(5), 477-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.745935

LinkOut - more resources