Preference for ugly faces? -A cognitive study of attentional and memorial biases toward facial information among young females with facial dissatisfaction

Abstract

Dissatisfaction with facial appearance is one of the strongest contributors to body image disturbance among young Chinese females and leads to a series of psychological and behavioral disorders. By conducting behavioral and ERP experiments, this study illustrates how young females in China with facial dissatisfaction process different levels of facial attractiveness. Experiments 1 and 2 are behavioral experiments in which the dot-probe paradigm was used to explore the participant's attentional bias to facial attractiveness. The results showed that regardless of whether the face image was presented above or below the threshold, young females with facial dissatisfaction exhibited attentional orientation toward lowly attractive faces and attentional avoidance to both lowly and highly attractive faces, while the control group showed difficulty in attentional disengagement from highly attractive faces. In experiment 3, the learning-recognition task was used to examine mnemonic bias toward facial attractiveness among females with facial dissatisfaction, and EEG data were also recorded during the encoding and retrieval phases. The study found that young females with facial dissatisfaction exhibited a mnemonic preference for lowly attractive images at both the encoding and retrieving stages, with higher P1, N170, P2, and N300 induced by lowly attractive faces, while the control group preferred highly attractive faces. In conclusion, young females with facial dissatisfaction tend to exhibit attentional orientation and mnemonic bias toward lowly attractive faces.

Keywords: behavioral experiments & ERP experiments; cognitive bias; facial attractiveness; facial dissatisfaction; young females.

Figure 1

Sample of experimental procedure in experiment 1.

Figure 2

Sample of experimental procedure in experiment 3.

Figure 3

Percentage of correct accuracy (ACC) to attractive faces in the learning phase and retrieval phase. **p < 0.05.

Figure 4

Reaction times (RTs) in response to attractive faces in the learning phase and retrieval phase. **p < 0.05.

Figure 5

ERPs response recorded during the retrieval phase.

Figure 6

Differential topographical maps.