Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 3:13:1026951.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1026951. eCollection 2022.

Primary antibody response after influenza virus infection is first dominated by low-mutated HA-stem antibodies followed by higher-mutated HA-head antibodies

Affiliations

Primary antibody response after influenza virus infection is first dominated by low-mutated HA-stem antibodies followed by higher-mutated HA-head antibodies

Aafke Aartse et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Several studies have shown that the first encounter with influenza virus shapes the immune response to future infections or vaccinations. However, a detailed analysis of the primary antibody response is lacking as this is difficult to study in humans. It is therefore not known what the frequency and dynamics of the strain-specific hemagglutinin (HA) head- and stem-directed antibody responses are directly after primary influenza virus infection. Here, sera of twelve H1N1pdm2009 influenza virus-infected cynomolgus macaques were evaluated for HA-head and HA-stem domain antibody responses. We observed an early induction of HA-stem antibody responses, which was already decreased by day 56. In contrast, responses against the HA-head domain were low early after infection and increased at later timepoint. The HA-specific B cell repertoires in each animal showed diverse VH-gene usage with preferred VH-gene and JH-gene family usage for HA-head or HA-stem B cells but a highly diverse allelic variation within the VH-usage. HA-head B cells had shorter CDRH3s and higher VH-gene somatic hyper mutation levels relative to HA-stem B cells. In conclusion, our data suggest that HA-stem antibodies are the first to react to the infection while HA-head antibodies show a delayed response, but a greater propensity to enter the germinal center and undergo affinity maturation.

Keywords: HA-head; HA-stem; antibody response; hemagglutinin; influenza A virus; primary response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HA-antibody responses to H1N1pdm2009 at day 0, 14, and 56 post-infection (A) Antibody response measured in serum in time against the HA-trimer (blue), HA-head (orange), and HA-stem (purple) domains, calculated as area under curve (AUC), median and 95% CI are depicted (B) Correlation between cumulative viral load in tracheal swabs (AUC) and antibody responses against HA-trimer (blue), HA-head (orange), and HA-stem (purple) domain measured at day 56. (C) Correlation between HA-head and HA-stem antibody responses at day 14 (left) and day 56 (right). Statistical differences between two groups were determined using the Wilcoxon test (p values: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001) and correlations were determined using a Spearman correlation test (ns, not significant).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of HA-specific B cell responses at day 56 post-infection (A) Percentage of the HA-specific B cells of pre- (green) and post-infection (blue) samples. (B) Comparison of the percentage of IgM+, IgG+/IgM+, IgG+, and IgG-/IgM- B cells detected in the total B cell pool (green) and HA-specific B cells (blue). (C) Frequency of HA-head+stem (grey), HA-head (orange), HA-stem (purple), and HA-trimer-only (yellow) binding B cells within the total HA-specific binding B cells. (D) Percentage of IgM+, IgG+/IgM+, IgG+, and IgG-/IgM- B cells observed within the HA-head+stem (grey), HA-head (orange), HA-stem (purple), and HA-trimer-only (yellow) populations of HA-specific cells. (E) Correlation between HA-specific antibody response (AUC) and frequency of HA-specific B cells measured at day 56. (F) Correlation between cumulative viral load in tracheal swabs (AUC) and frequency of HA-specific B cells at day 56. Statistical differences between two groups were determined using the Wilcoxon test (p values: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001), bars represent medians with 95% CI, and correlations were determined using a Spearman correlation test (ns, not significant).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Characteristics of HA-specific BCR repertoire and monoclonal antibodies (A) Overlay flowcytometry plot of index-sorted HA-specific B cells of six animals. Original B cells of isolated monoclonal antibodies are highlighted according to ELISA binding pattern, in orange HA-head, in yellow HA-trimer-only, in purple HA-stem, and in grey HA-head+stem. (B) Table presenting the binding domain of HA-specific mAb in ELISA and flow cytometry and the binding domain HA-specific BCRs in flow cytometry. (C) BCR repertoire of IgM germline and HA-specific VH-gene usage. Size of the dots represent relative gene expression per animal. (D) Bar plots representing VH-gene (left) or JH-gene (right) family usage of HA-specific total BCRs, HA-head+stem, HA-head, HA-stem, and HA-trimer-only specific BCRs (upper panel) or isolated monoclonal antibodies (lower panel). (E) Violin plot showing VH-gene SHM-level of pre- (green) and post- infection HA-specific BCRs. Post-infection BCRs are shown in IgM+, IgM+/IgG+, IgG+, and IgM-/IgG- isotypes. (F) Violin plot showing VH-gene SHM-level of HA-head+stem (grey), HA-head (orange), HA-stem (purple), and HA-trimer-only (blue) specific BCRs. (G) Density histogram showing CDRH3-length in amino acids (aa) of total HA-specific BCRs. Dotted line represents the median CDRH3-length. (H) Density histogram showing CDRH3-length distribution of HA-head (orange) and HA-stem (purple) BCRs. Dotted lines represent corresponding medians. Statistical differences between two groups were determined using the Mann-Whitney test (p values: *p < 0.05; ****p < 0.0001).

References

    1. Dugan HL, Guthmiller JJ, Arevalo P, Huang M, Chen Y-Q, Neu KE, et al. . Preexisting immunity shapes distinct antibody landscapes after influenza virus infection and vaccination in humans. Sci Trans Med (2020) 12(573):eabd3601. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd3601 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henry C, Palm A-KE, Krammer F, Wilson PC. From original antigenic sin to the universal influenza virus vaccine. Trends Immunol (2018) 39(1):70–9. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.08.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guthmiller JJ, Wilson PC. Harnessing immune history to combat influenza viruses. Curr Opin Immunol (2018) 53:187–95. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2018.05.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan H-X, Jegaskanda S, Juno JA, Esterbauer R, Wong J, Kelly HG, et al. . Subdominance and poor intrinsic immunogenicity limit humoral immunity targeting influenza HA stem. J Clin Invest (2019) 129(2):850–62. doi: 10.1172/JCI123366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu NC, Wilson IA. Influenza hemagglutinin structures and antibody recognition. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med (2020) 10(8):a038778. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038778 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances