Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 3:13:974087.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.974087. eCollection 2022.

The role of immune profile in predicting outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Affiliations

The role of immune profile in predicting outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Andrea Botticelli et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the efficacy of immunotherapy, only a small percentage of patients achieves a long-term benefit in terms of overall survival. The aim of this study was to define an immune profile predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, who underwent ICI treatment were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood samples were collected at the baseline. Thirteen soluble immune checkpoints, 3 soluble adhesion molecules, 5 chemokines and 11 cytokines were analyzed. The results were associated with oncological outcomes.

Results: Regardless of tumor type, patients with values of sTIM3, IFNα, IFNγ, IL1β, IL1α, IL12p70, MIP1β, IL13, sCD28, sGITR, sPDL1, IL10 and TNFα below the median had longer overall survival (p<0.05). By using cluster analysis and grouping the patients according to the trend of the molecules, two clusters were found. Cluster A had a significantly higher mean progression free survival (Cluster A=11.9 months vs Cluster B=3.5 months, p<0.01), a higher percentage of disease stability (Cluster A=34.5% vs. Cluster B=0%, p<0.05) and a lower percentage of disease progression (Cluster A=55.2% vs. Cluster B = 94.4%, p=0.04).

Conclusion: The combined evaluation of soluble molecules, rather than a single circulating factor, may be more suitable to represent the fitness of the immune system status in each patient and could allow to identify two different prognostic and predictive outcome profiles.

Keywords: chemokines; cytokines; immunotherapy; soluble immune check-points; tumor biomarker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PM has/had a consultant/advisory role for BMS, Roche, Genentech, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, and Incyte. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multiple Soluble ICs and cytokines/chemokines are correlated with OS. Each value of soluble factor, regardless of cancer type, was dichotomized as under the median or above the median. Kaplan-Meier evaluation showed that low values of soluble CD28, GITR, PDL1, TIM3, INFα, INFγ, IL1β, IL10, IL1α, IIL12p70, IL13, MIP1β and TNFα were associated with better OS (p<0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multiple Soluble ICs and cytokines/chemokines are correlated with PFS. Kaplan-Meier evaluation showed that, dichotomizing values of soluble factors under or above the median, low levels of soluble CD28, GITR, PDL1, IL10 and IL13, were associated with longer PFS (p<0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. (A) The heat-map of cluster analysis. Soluble molecule tested are listed in the top of the figure. The unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis identified 2 distinct clusters of patients based on the soluble immune profile associated with a different oncological outcome: Cluster A (green box) and Cluster B (red box). The color intensity of every single square in the heat-map is directly associated with the measured concentration in pg/ml. Each square in heat-map represents the higher value (red), equal value (black) or lower level (green) of signal of any given tested soluble molecules for each tested patient, (B) Oncological outcomes were reported for each cluster. Cluster A was associated with longer PFS and higher SD rate than Cluster B (11.9 months vs. 3.5 months, and 34.5% vs.0, respectively).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Progression free survival. As highlighted in Kaplan Meier curves, patients in Cluster A showed a significantly longer PFS than patients in Cluster B, 11.9 months vs. 3.5 months, p<0.01.
Figure 5
Figure 5
By means of cluster analysis, the circulating immune profile detected at baseline made it possible to identify two distinct groups of patients (Cluster A and B) characterized by the activation of different immune pathways resulting in two distinct clinical outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science (2015) 348:56–61. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8172 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moller G, Moller E. The concept of immunological surveillance against neoplasia. Immunol Rev (1976) 28:3–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1976.tb00189.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drake CG, Jaffee E, Pardoll DM. Mechanisms of immune evasion by tumors. Adv Immunol (2006) 90:51–81. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(06)90002-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, Weber JS, Margolin K, Hamid O, et al. . Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol (2015) 33:1889–94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2736 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, et al. . Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med (2015) 372:320–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances