Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 3:13:1036794.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1036794. eCollection 2022.

Investigating the molecular genetic, genomic, brain structural, and brain functional correlates of latent transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology across the lifespan: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in the general population

Affiliations

Investigating the molecular genetic, genomic, brain structural, and brain functional correlates of latent transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology across the lifespan: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in the general population

Nicholas Hoy et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Research using latent variable modelling has identified a superordinate general dimension of psychopathology, as well as several specific/lower-order transdiagnostic dimensions (e.g., internalising and externalising) within the meta-structure of psychiatric symptoms. These models can facilitate discovery in genetic and neuroscientific research by providing empirically derived psychiatric phenotypes, offering greater validity and reliability than traditional diagnostic categories. The prospective review outlined in this protocol aims to integrate and assess evidence from research investigating the biological correlates of general psychopathology and specific/lower-order transdiagnostic symptom dimensions. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies investigating general population samples of any age group or developmental period will be included to capture evidence from across the lifespan.

Methods and analysis: MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases will be systematically searched for relevant literature. The review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligibility criteria were designed to capture psychiatric genetic (i.e., molecular genetic and genomic) and neuroimaging (i.e., brain structural and brain functional) studies investigating latent transdiagnostic dimension(s) or structural model(s) of psychopathology across any age group. Studies which include or exclude participants based on clinical symptoms, disorders, or relevant risk factors (e.g., history of abuse, neglect, and trauma) will be excluded. Biometric genetic research (e.g., twin and family studies), candidate gene studies, neurophysiology studies, and other non-imaging based neuroscientific studies (e.g., post-mortem studies) will be excluded. Study quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies, the Joanna Briggs Checklist for Cohort Studies, and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Meta-analysis will be conducted if sufficient data is available.

Discussion: This protocol outlines the first systematic review to examine evidence from studies investigating the latent structure and underlying biology of psychopathology and to characterise these relationships developmentally across the lifespan. The prospective review will cover a broad range of statistical techniques and models used to investigate latent transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology, as well as a numerous genetic and neuroscientific methods.

Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier[CRD42021262717].

Keywords: brain function; brain structure; externalising; genomic; internalising; lifespan; p-factor; psychopathology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Exposure/outcome relationships that will be examined in the upcoming review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Silbersweig DA, Rauch SL. Neuroimaging in psychiatry: a quarter century of progress. Harv Rev Psychiatry. (2017) 25:195–7. 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000177 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Insel TR, Lehner T. A new era in psychiatric genetics? Biol Psychiatry. (2007) 61:1017–8. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.016 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Venkatasubramanian G, Keshavan MS. Biomarkers in psychiatry – a critique. Ann. Neurosci. (2016) 23:3–5. 10.1159/000443549 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. (2022) 9:137–50. 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Med. (2013) 11:126. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-126 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources