Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 3:13:999783.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.999783. eCollection 2022.

Performance evaluation of a new on-demand molecular test for the rapid identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in pediatric and adult patients

Affiliations

Performance evaluation of a new on-demand molecular test for the rapid identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in pediatric and adult patients

Luna Colagrossi et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

The rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has increased the need to identify additional rapid diagnostic tests for an accurate and early diagnosis of infection. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the cartridge-based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 (SD Biosensor Inc., Suwon, South Korea), targeting the ORF1ab and E gene of SARS-CoV-2, and which can process up to eight samples in parallel in 60 min. From January 2022 to March 2022, STANDARD™ M10 assay performance was compared with Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid, Sunnyvale CA) on 616 nasopharyngeal swabs from consecutive pediatric (N = 533) and adult (N = 83) patients presenting at the "Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico" (IRCCS) Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Roma. The overall performance of STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 was remarkably and consistently comparable to the Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 with an overall agreement of 98% (604/616 concordant results), and negligible differences in time-to-result (60 min vs. 50 min, respectively). When the Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 results were considered as the reference, STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 had 96.5% sensitivity and 98.4% specificity. STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 can thus be safely included in diagnostic pathways because it rapidly and accurately identifies SARS-CoV-2 present in nasopharyngeal swabs.

Keywords: COVID-19; RT-PCR testing; SARS-CoV-2; comparative diagnostic accuracy; molecular diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Bland-Altman-plot analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Ct levels measured by Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and STANDARD MIO SARS-CoV-2 assays. Bland-Altman plot analysis of 109 positive samples tested with both assays. On y-axis are reported the differences between paired samples while on x-axis their means. Limit of agreement (+1.96 SD) is represented by a green (upper limit) and red (lower limit) bands. The midline bend (blue) represent the mean bias observed between the assay estimated around 0.8 Ct.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Density distribution in mean gene Ct values between two systems (mean between gene E and N for Xpress SARS-CoV-2, gene E and Orflab for STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
SARS-CoV-2 Ct distribution comparison. Violin width informs about the number of elements observed at any Ct level. Upper dots can be considered as outliers since far from the mam population. Internal boxplots provide a dimension of IQR and median values. Among samples tested with two systems, violin plots compare: (A) Mean gene Ct value distribution; (B) E gene Ct value distribution.

References

    1. Alteri C., Cento V., Antonello M., Colagrossi L., Merli M., Ughi N., et al. (2020). Detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR in real-time PCR negative nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients. PLoS One 15:e0236311. 10.1371/journal.pone.0236311 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alteri C., Scutari R., Costabile V., Colagrossi L., La Rosa K. Y., Agolini E., et al. (2022). Epidemiological characterization of SARS-CoV-2 variants in children over the four COVID-19 waves and correlation with clinical presentation. Sci. Rep. 12:12814. 10.1038/s41598-022-17020-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bian L., Gao Q., Gao F., Wang Q., He Q., Wu X., et al. (2021). Impact of the Delta variant on vaccine efficacy and response strategies. Expert Rev. Vaccines 20 1201–1209. 10.1080/14760584.2021.1976153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burkhard-Koren N. M., Haberecker M., Maccio U., Ruschitzka F., Schuepbach R. A., Zinkernagel A. S., et al. (2021). Higher prevalence of pulmonary macrothrombi in SARS-CoV-2 than in influenza A: Autopsy results from ‘Spanish flu’ 1918/1919 in Switzerland to Coronavirus disease 2019. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 7 135–143. 10.1002/cjp2.189 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDC (2022). Interim guidelines for collecting and handling of clinical specimens for COVID-19 testing. Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specim... (accessed July, 2022).