Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 5;20(2):629-640.
doi: 10.1007/s40201-022-00789-z. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Quantitative microbial risk assessment of enteroviruses in raw-eatable vegetables irrigated by wastewater: examining different scenarios of washing

Affiliations

Quantitative microbial risk assessment of enteroviruses in raw-eatable vegetables irrigated by wastewater: examining different scenarios of washing

Seyed Yaser Hashemi et al. J Environ Health Sci Eng. .

Abstract

Due to the increasing water crisis, the reuse of wastewater deserves attention as a method to reduce the pressure of the water crisis, especially in developing countries. The application of health risk assessment models is a way to estimate disease burdens associated with crop irrigation by wastewater effluents. In this study, a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) with probabilistic Monte-Carlo simulation was used to estimate the annual risk of enteroviruses (EVs) infection and disease burden for consumers of effluent-irrigated raw vegetables in Tehran, the capital of Iran. Wastewater effluent samples were collected over two seasons: summer and winter. EVs were analyzed in three stages, concentration and separation, cell culture, and real-time PCR (RT-PCR). A questionnaire was used to determine the dominant patterns of vegetable washing by consumers. There were 4 vegetable washing steps: wiping away mud (A), rinsing (B), using detergents (C), using disinfectants (D). 5 patterns of washing were examined in the laboratory and the concentration of enteroviruses was measured in every pattern. pattern 1: just wiping away mud (A), pattern 2: wiping away mud and rinsing (AB), pattern 3: wiping away mud by using detergents and rinsing (ABCB), pattern 4: wiping away mud by using disinfectants and rinsing (ABDB), and pattern 5: wiping away mud by using detergents and disinfectants and rinsing (ABCBDB). For washing pattern 1, pattern 2, and pattern 3, the estimated annual infection risk of EVs was estimated to be 5.6 × 10-1, 3.6 × 10-1, 1.7 × 10-1 (risk/per.day), and burden of disease was calculated as 3 × 10-2, 2 × 10-2, and 9 × 10-3 (burden/year), respectively. The results showed that if vegetables are washed according to method 5, the microbial risk will be minimized and the excess prevalence of viral infections will be eliminated.

Keywords: Enterovirus infection; QMRA; Real-time PCR; Vegetables; Wastewater effluents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The studying area location (WWTPs and downstream farmlands)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency of vegetable consumption in the community
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Amount of vegetable consumption in a meal per person
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Vegetable washing patterns
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The comparison of EVs and total coliforms (TC) concentrations in two seasons
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The box plots. (A): estimated annual probability of infection risk (Pi (A)) (pppy) and
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Variability cumulative distribution plots of the EV burden of disease for every washing scenario. A: pattern 1, B: pattern 2 and C: pattern 3. Y-axis is the percentile of variability and the X-axis is the point estimate of the burden of disease. Light gray bands correspond to the 95% uncertainty range on each quantile of variability and the 50% uncertainty range on each quantile of variability is corresponded by dark gray bands
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Burden of disease sensitive analysis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. L. Chacón, K. Barrantes, C. Santamaría-Ulloa, M. Solano, L. Reyes, L. Taylor, et al., "A somatic coliphage threshold approach to improve the management of activated sludge wastewater treatment plant effluents in resource-limited regions," Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 86, 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. J. Fito and S. W. Van Hulle, "Wastewater reclamation and reuse potentials in agriculture: towards environmental sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability, pp. 1–24, 2020.
    1. Revitt DM, Lundy L, Fatta-Kassinos D. Development of a qualitative approach to assessing risks associated with the use of treated wastewater in agricultural irrigation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;406:124286. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124286. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baghapour MA, Nasseri S, Djahed B. Evaluation of Shiraz wastewater treatment plant effluent quality for agricultural irrigation by Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) Iranian journal of environmental health science & engineering. 2013;10:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1735-2746-10-27. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lotfi K, Bonakdari H, Ebtehaj I, Delatolla R, Zinatizadeh AA, Gharabaghi B. A novel stochastic wastewater quality modeling based on fuzzy techniques. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2020;18:1099–1120. doi: 10.1007/s40201-020-00530-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources