Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion with and without muscle relaxant in pediatric anesthesia; a randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 36406720
- PMCID: PMC9672355
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11504
Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion with and without muscle relaxant in pediatric anesthesia; a randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using muscle relaxant on the ease of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion and possibility of its related complications.
Methods: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was performed on 60 children aged 1-4 years with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) I or II with upper limb injuries who were candidates for surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to the two groups receiving atracurium group as muscle relaxant (MR) or saline group (S).
Results: Regarding ease of placement, the LMA was inserted in 66.7% and 63.3% of patients straightforwardly in the MR and S groups, respectively. While it was performed with one maneuver in 23.3% and 26.7% of cases in the MR and S groups, respectively (p = 0.955). Moreover, LMA dislodgment in the two groups was 36.7% in the MR group and 20.0% in the S group without a meaningful difference (P = 0.152). The only complication observed in the two groups was laryngospasm, which occurred in 0.10% and 13.3% in the MR and S groups, respectively (p = 0.688).
Conclusion: In some pediatric anesthesia, the use of atracurium, as a muscle relaxant had no significant effect on capability of LMA insertion, maintaining airway patency, LMA seal pressure and oxygenation variations. Moreover, it did not have a preventive effect on the occurrence of complications such as laryngospasm.
Keywords: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA); Muscle relaxant; Pediatrics anesthesia.
© 2022 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Doksrød S., Løfgren B., Nordhammer A., Svendsen M.V., Gisselsson L., Ræder J. Reinforced laryngeal mask airway compared with endotracheal tube for adenotonsillectomies. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol.(EJA) 2010;27(11):941–946. - PubMed
-
- Francois A., Rosenbaum M., Adams W., Schantz O., Stankiewicz J. The use of supraglottic airway vs tracheal tube for endoscopic nasal sinus surgery. Trends Anaesth. Crit. Care. 2020;33:17–22.
-
- Kriege M., Noppens R.R. What should we expect in anaesthesia, critical care and prehospital care from extra glottic airways? Proven clinical performance for a variety of indications and patients. Trends Anaesth. Crit. Care. 2019;25:32–35.
-
- van Esch B.F., Stegeman I., Smit A.L. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway vs tracheal intubation: a systematic review on airway complications. J. Clin. Anesth. 2017;36:142–150. - PubMed
-
- Nevešćanin A., Vickov J., Elezović Baloević S., Pogorelić Z. Laryngeal mask airway versus tracheal intubation for laparoscopic hernia repair in children: analysis of respiratory complications. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 2020;30(1):76–80. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources