Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 24:35:10915.
doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10915. eCollection 2022.

ESOT Consensus Platform for Organ Transplantation: Setting the Stage for a Rigorous, Regularly Updated Development Process

Affiliations
Review

ESOT Consensus Platform for Organ Transplantation: Setting the Stage for a Rigorous, Regularly Updated Development Process

Umberto Cillo et al. Transpl Int. .

Abstract

The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) has created a platform for the development of rigorous and regularly updated evidence based guidelines for clinical practice in the transplantation field. A dedicated Guideline Taskforce, including ESOT-council members, a representative from the Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, editors of the journal Transplant International has developed transparent procedures to guide the development of guidelines, recommendations, and consensus statements. During ESOT's first Consensus Conference in November 2022, leading experts will present in-depth evidence based reviews of nine themes and will propose recommendations aimed at reaching a consensus after public discussion and assessment by an independent jury. All recommendations and consensus statements produced for the nine selected topics will be published including the entire evidence-based consensus-finding process. An extensive literature review of each topic was conducted to provide final evidence and/or expert opinion.

Keywords: consensus conference; guidelines; methodology; organ transplantation; platform.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

IJ received speaker fees from XVIVO perfusion paid to her institution. IJ is an ESOT Councilor for which she receives no reimbursement. JFe is recipient of a grant supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project “PI18/00161 (Optimization of pancreas transplant graft: A multicentric study of histo-morphological and functional characteristics of unaccepted organs.)” and co-funded by the European Union. AdV received in the past speaker and consultation fees from Astellas, Chiesi, Hansa, Novartis, Sandoz, CSL Behring all of which paid to his institution. AdV is chair of the Dutch Kidney Advisory Committee (Landelijk Overleg NierTransplantatie LONT) for which he receives no reimbursement. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Topics selected by ESOT Guideline Taskforce (GT) for consensus conference, TLJ 3.0, Prague November 2022.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Waggoner J, Carline JD, Durning SJ. Is There a Consensus on Consensus Methodology? Descriptions and Recommendations for Future Consensus Research. Acad Med (2016) 91(5):663–8. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001092 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corbie-Smith G, Wynn M, Richmond A, Rennie S, Green M, Hoover SM, et al. Stakeholder-driven, Consensus Development Methods to Design an Ethical Framework and Guidelines for Engaged Research. PLoS One (2018) 13(6):e0199451. 10.1371/journal.pone.0199451 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CF, Askham J, et al. Consensus Development Methods, and Their Use in Clinical Guideline Development. Health Technol Assess (1998) 2:1. 10.3310/hta2030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Improve the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program. Consensus Development at the NIH: Improving the Program. Washington (DC): National Academies Press US; (1990). - PubMed
    1. Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, McKee M, Sanderson C, Askham J, et al. Consensus Development Methods: a Review of Best Practice in Creating Clinical Guidelines. J Health Serv Res Pol (1999) 4(4):236–48. 10.1177/135581969900400410 - DOI - PubMed