Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Re-evaluation of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) as a food additive

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) when used as a food additive. It is obtained by catalytic hydrogenation of a flavanone - neohesperidine - which is naturally occurring and thus isolated by alcohol extraction in bitter oranges (Citrus aurantium). Based on in vivo data in rat, neohesperidine dihydrochalcone is likely to be absorbed, also in humans, and to become systemically available. It does not raise a concern regarding genotoxicity. The toxicity data set consisted of studies on subchronic and prenatal developmental toxicity. No human studies were available. The data set was considered sufficient to derive a new acceptable daily intake (ADI). Based on the weight of evidence (WoE) analysis, the Panel considered unlikely that neohesperidine dihydrochalcone would lead to adverse effects on health in animals in the dose ranges tested. The Panel also considered that a carcinogenicity study was not warranted and that the lack of human data did not affect the overall confidence in the body of evidence. The Panel derived an ADI of 20 mg/kg bodyweight (bw) per day based on a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 4,000 mg/kg bw per day from a 13-week study in rat, applying the standard default factors of 100 for inter- and intraspecies differences and of 2 for extrapolation from subchronic to chronic exposure. For the refined brand-loyal exposure assessment scenario, considered to be the most appropriate for the risk assessment, the exposure estimates at the mean ranged from < 0.01 to 0.09 mg/kg bw per day and at the 95th percentile (P95) from 0.01 to 0.24 mg/kg bw per day. Considering the derived ADI of 20 mg/kg bw per day, the exposure estimates were below the reference value in all age groups. Therefore, the Panel concluded that dietary exposure to the food additive neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) at the reported uses and use levels would not raise a safety concern.

Keywords: E 959; food additive; neohesperidine dihydrochalcone; sweetener.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structure of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative chromatogram of E 959 with the individual impurities determined by HPLC analysis, as provided by one interested business operator (Documentation provided to EFSA nr: 3)
Figure A.1
Figure A.1
PRISMA flow chart (adapted from Moher et al., 2009)
Figure A.2
Figure A.2
Translation of confidence ratings into level of evidence for conclusions of adverse effects on health or no adverse effects on health (adapted from NTP‐OHAT, 2019)
Figure A.3
Figure A.3
Scenarios for integration of animal and human evidence

Similar articles

  • Flavouring group evaluation 420 (FGE.420): Hesperetin dihydrochalcone.
    EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF); Castle L, Andreassen M, Aquilina G, Bastos M, Boon P, Fallico B, FitzGerald R, Frutos Fernandez MJ, Grasl-Kraupp B, Gundert-Remy U, Gürtler R, Houdeau E, Kurek M, Louro H, Morales P, Passamonti S, Degen G, Engel KH, Fowler P, Carfí M, Civitella C, Dino B, Gagliardi G, Mech A, Zakidou P, Martino C. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), et al. EFSA J. 2024 Dec 4;22(12):e9091. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9091. eCollection 2024 Dec. EFSA J. 2024. PMID: 39633873 Free PMC article.
  • Re-evaluation of benzyl alcohol (E 1519) as food additive.
    EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF); Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Engel KH, Fowler P, Fürst P, Gürtler R, Gundert-Remy U, Husøy T, Mennes W, Moldeus P, Oskarsson A, Shah R, Waalkens-Berendsen I, Wölfle D, Boon P, Crebelli R, Di Domenico A, Filipič M, Mortensen A, Van Loveren H, Woutersen R, Gergelova P, Giarola A, Lodi F, Frutos Fernandez MJ. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), et al. EFSA J. 2019 Oct 30;17(10):e05876. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5876. eCollection 2019 Oct. EFSA J. 2019. PMID: 32626148 Free PMC article.
  • Re-evaluation of propane-1,2-diol (E 1520) as a food additive.
    EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS); Younes M, Aggett P, Aguilar F, Crebelli R, Dusemund B, Filipič M, Frutos MJ, Galtier P, Gott D, Gundert-Remy U, Kuhnle GG, Leblanc JC, Lillegaard IT, Moldeus P, Mortensen A, Oskarsson A, Stankovic I, Waalkens-Berendsen I, Woutersen RA, Wright M, Boon P, Chrysafidis D, Gürtler R, Mosesso P, Parent-Massin D, Tobback P, Rincon AM, Tard A, Lambré C. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS), et al. EFSA J. 2018 Apr 5;16(4):e05235. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5235. eCollection 2018 Apr. EFSA J. 2018. PMID: 32625872 Free PMC article.
  • Dietary glycation compounds - implications for human health.
    Hellwig M, Diel P, Eisenbrand G, Grune T, Guth S, Henle T, Humpf HU, Joost HG, Marko D, Raupbach J, Roth A, Vieths S, Mally A. Hellwig M, et al. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024 Sep;54(8):485-617. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985. Epub 2024 Aug 16. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024. PMID: 39150724
  • Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Agriculture and Environment Research Unit, University of Hertfordshire , Lewis KA and Tzilivakis J, 2021. Review and synthesis of data on the potential environmental impact of artificial sweeteners. EFSA supporting publication 2021;EN‐6918, 127 pp. 10.2903/sp.efsa.2021.EN-6918 - DOI
    1. Arbelaez P, Borrull F, Pocurull E and Marce RM, 2015. Determination of high‐intensity sweeteners in river water and wastewater by solid‐phase extraction and liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1393, 106–114. 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.03.035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batzinger RP, Ou S‐YL and Bueding E, 1977. Saccharin and other sweeteners: mutagenic properties. Science, 198, 944–946. 10.1126/science.337489 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benavente‐Garcia O, Castillo J, Del Baño MJ and Lorente J, 2001. Improved water solubility of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone in sweetener blends. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49(1), 189–191. 10.1021/jf000186l - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjeldanes LF and Chang GW, 1977. Mutagenic activity of quercetin and related compounds. Science, 197, 577–578. 10.1126/science.327550 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources