Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 3:9:1040251.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1040251. eCollection 2022.

Prediction, prevention, and management of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: A comprehensive review

Affiliations
Review

Prediction, prevention, and management of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: A comprehensive review

Eduard Rodenas-Alesina et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly common across the heart failure population. Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a feared complication that can occur in the early post-operative phase or during the outpatient follow-up. Multiple tools are available to the clinician to carefully estimate the individual risk of developing RVF after LVAD implantation. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of available tools for RVF prognostication, including patient-specific and right ventricle (RV)-specific echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, to provide guidance in patient selection during LVAD candidacy. We also offer a multidisciplinary approach to the management of early RVF, including indications and management of right ventricular assist devices in this setting to provide tools that help managing the failing RV.

Keywords: heart failure (HF); hemocompatibility adverse events (HRAE); left ventricular assist device (LVAD); right ventricle (RV); right ventricular assist device (RVAD); right ventricular failure (RVF).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ER-A has received non-conditioned grants from Biotronik, Microport, Johnson and Johnson, and Sanofi outside of the submitted work. DB has received travel support from Abbott and Biotronik, and honoraria, travel support and a grant from Boston Scientific outside of the submitted work. FB has received support from Abbott Laboratories for investigations outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Definition of right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation according to INTERMACS from 2015 and from 2021. INTERMACS, interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support; MCS-ARC, mechanical circulatory support–academic research consortium; CVP, central venous pressure; IVC, inferior vena cava; JVP, jugular venous pressure; iNO, nitric oxide; IV, intravenous; RVAD, right ventricular assist device; RVF, right ventricular failure; ULN, upper limit of normal; Svo2, central venous oxygen saturation; CI, cardiac index; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; LVAD, left ventricular assist device.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Risk factors for right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation not related to the intrinsic right ventricular function. LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; NICM, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy; ARVC, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; VT, ventricular tachycardia; BSA, body surface area; BMI, body mass index; NRI, nutrition risk index; PNI, prognostic nutrition index; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; RRT, renal replacement therapy; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; INTERMACS, interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support; VE, minute ventilation; VCO2, carbon dioxide production; DLCO, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; INR, international normalized ratio; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; ET1, endothelin 1; IL6, interleukin-6; PCT, procalcitonin; CCR, CC chemokine receptor.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Risk factors for right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation obtained using echocardiography. RA, right atrial; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursión; RV, right ventricle; FAC, fractional área change; RVFWLS, right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain; PSSrL, peak systolic longitudinal strain rate; PA, pulmonary artery.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Risk factors for right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation obtained using pulmonary artery catheterization. DTPG, diastolic transpulmonary gradient; PA, pulmonary artery; Ees, end-systolic elastance; Ea, arterial elastance; RVSWI, right ventricular stroke work index; RV, right ventricle; RA, right atrium; CVP, central venous pressure; PCWP, pre-capillary wedge pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PAPI, pulmonary artery pulsatility index; pVAD, percutaneous ventricular assist device; iSV, indexed stroke volume.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Prevalence, risk factors for progression and management for valvular regurgitation at the time of LVAD implant to minimize the risk of right ventricular dysfunction. TR, tricuspid regurgitation; MR, mitral regurgitation; AR, aortic regurgitation; TV, tricuspid valve; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; NICM, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy; STJ, sinotubular junction.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Adverse events associated with right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Proposed algorithm for management of early right ventricular failure. aSigns of hypoperfusion (lactate >2 mmol/L, MAP <60 mmHg, drop in pump flows, mottled skin, oliguria) supported by hemodynamic (CVP >15, PAPI <1, RV stroke work index <300, CI <2 ml/min/m2, mixed venous oxygen saturation <50%), echocardiographic (dilated RV, leftwards septal bulge, severe TR, fixed and distended IVC) or laboratory data (rise in creatinine, blood urea nitrogen or liver enzymes). bCorrect hypoxemia (if significant, rule out intracardiac shunts), hypercarbia and acidosis. cCommon causes for VT are metabolic derangementsb, ischemia (supply demand but also direct damage during surgery), pacing-related issues, scar-mediated or suction events. dAim for low positive end-expiratory pressure (just enough to minimize atelectasis), low mean airway pressure and avoid air entrapment. Plan for early extubation if possible. eMilrinone (0.125–0.75 μg/kg/min) is usually preferred to dobutamine or epinephrine given their deleterious on PVR. Low dose dobutamine (2–5 μg/kg/min) may not affect PVR. Epinephrine can be used if patient is hypotensive. fNorepinephrine (0.01–0.5 μg/kg/min) is the most used pressor, but vasopressin (0.01–0.06 U/min) should be added at low dose as it has less vasoconstrictive effect on the pulmonary vasculature. RV, right ventricular; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography; PA, pulmonary artery; HR, heart rate; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; DCCV, direct current cardioversion; VT, ventricular tachycardia; VF, ventricular fibrillation; ATP, antitachycardia pacing; ICD, internal cardiac defibrillator; RVAD, right ventricular assist device; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; iNO, nitric oxide; CVP, central venous pressure; RRT, renal replacement therapy; MAP, mean arterial pressure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldstein DJ, Meyns B, Xie R, Cowger J, Pettit S, Nakatani T, et al. Third annual report from the ISHLT mechanically assisted circulatory support registry: a comparison of centrifugal and axial continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2019) 38:352–63. 10.1016/j.healun.2019.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frankfurter C, Molinero M, Vishram-Nielsen JKK, Foroutan F, Mak S, Rao V, et al. Predicting the risk of right ventricular failure in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation: a systematic review. Circ Heart Fail. (2020) 13:e006994. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.006994 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molina EJ, Shah P, Kiernan MS, Cornwell WK, III, Copeland H, Takeda K, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons intermacs 2020 annual report. Ann Thorac Surg. (2021) 111:778–92. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.038 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de By TMMH, Schoenrath F, Veen KM, Mohacsi P, Stein J, Alkhamees KMM, et al. The European Registry for Patients with mechanical circulatory support of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: third report. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. (2022) 62:ezac032. 10.1093/ejcts/ezac350 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hall SA, Copeland H, Alam A, Joseph SM. The “right” definition for post-left ventricular assist device right heart failure: the more we learn, the less we know. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 9:893327. 10.3389/fcvm.2022.893327 - DOI - PMC - PubMed