Public attitudes towards bystander CPR and their association with social deprivation: Findings from a cross sectional study in North England
- PMID: 36407569
- PMCID: PMC9672441
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100330
Public attitudes towards bystander CPR and their association with social deprivation: Findings from a cross sectional study in North England
Abstract
Background: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) is undertaken in only 40% of out of hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) in the UK. Lower rates of BCPR and public access defibrillator (PAD) use have been correlated with lower socio-economic status (SES). The aim of this study was to examine knowledge and attitudes towards BCPR and PAD's using a study specific questionnaire, and to understand how these potentially interact with individual characteristics and SES.
Methods: Cross-sectional study between July-December 2021 across areas of varying SES in North England.
Results: Six hundred and one individuals completed the survey instrument (mean age = 51.9 years, 52.2 % female). Increased age was associated with being less willing to call 999 (p < 0.001) and follow call handler advice (p < 0.001). Female respondents were less comfortable performing BCPR than male respondents (p = 0.006). Individuals from least deprived areas were less likely to report comfort performing CPR, (p = 0.016) and less likely to know what a PAD is for, (p = 0.025). Higher education level was associated with increased ability to recognise OHCA (p = 0.005) and understanding of what a PAD is for (p < 0.001). Individuals with higher income were more likely to state they would follow advice regarding BCPR (p = 0.017) and report comfort using a PAD (p = 0.029).
Conclusion: Individual characteristics such as age and ethnicity, rather than SES, are indicators of knowledge, willingness, and perceived competency to perform BCPR. Policy makers should avoid using SES alone to target interventions. Future research should examine how cultural identity and social cohesion intersect with these characteristics to influence willingness to perform BCPR.
Keywords: Bystander help; Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation; Defibrillator; Deprivation.
Crown Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
-
- Resuscitation Council (UK). Consensus Paper on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in England. 2015. Available from https://www.resus.org.uk/sites/default/files/2020-05/OHCA_consensus_pape...
-
- Perkins G.D., Jacobs I.G., Nadkarni V.M., et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation [published correction appears in Circulation. 2015;132:e168–e169] Circulation. 2015;132:1286–1300. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000144. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous