Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;22(4):448-454.
doi: 10.18295/squmj.6.2022.042. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

Secondary Infertility due to Fetal Bone Retention A systematic literature review

Affiliations

Secondary Infertility due to Fetal Bone Retention A systematic literature review

Arjola Agolli et al. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Prolonged intrauterine retention of fetal bones during an abortion procedure can lead to secondary infertility. This review aimed to raise awareness among obstetric/gynaecologists about the possibility of this condition. A total of 17 case reports, seven case series and one retrospective study were included in this review, with 75 patients in total. Overall, 60% had a pregnancy termination in the second trimester, while 20% had a termination during the first trimester. Hysteroscopic resection was used to remove the intrauterine fetal bones in 69% of patients. In total, 59% of patients conceived following the procedure, 1% conceived despite the presence of intrauterine bones, 24% could not conceive at the time of the study and 16% had an unknown outcome. Transvaginal ultrasound was used for diagnosis in 41 (55%) patients, while pelvic ultrasound was used in 21 (28%) patients. In conclusion, secondary infertility is a common occurrence after a dilation and curettage procedure partially due to fetal bone retention. The gold standard for an accurate diagnosis and treatment is hysteroscopy.

Keywords: Abortion; Incomplete Abortion; Infertility; Miscarriage; Therapeutic Abortion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram depicting search strategy of all relevant articles from inception up to October 2021.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World Fertility and Family Planning 2020: Highlights. New York, USA: United Nations; 2020.
    1. Mesce D. Abortion Facts and Figures 2021. Washington, DC, USA: Population Reference Bureau; 2021.
    1. Singh S, Remez L, Sedgh G, Kwok L, Onda T. Abortion Worldwide 2017 Uneven Progress and Unequal Access. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2018.
    1. Ombelet W, Cooke I, Dyer S, Serour G, Devroey P. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:605–21. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn042. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources