Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 3:10:1020171.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1020171. eCollection 2022.

Putting prospection into practice: Methodological considerations in the use of episodic future thinking to reduce delay discounting and maladaptive health behaviors

Affiliations
Review

Putting prospection into practice: Methodological considerations in the use of episodic future thinking to reduce delay discounting and maladaptive health behaviors

Jeremiah Michael Brown et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

In recent years, episodic future thinking (EFT) has emerged as a promising behavioral intervention to reduce delay discounting or maladaptive health behaviors; however, considerable methodological heterogeneity in methods for eliciting engagement in EFT has been observed in prior research. In this narrative review, we briefly describe methods for generating EFT cues, the content of EFT cues, common control conditions for experiments utilizing EFT, and considerations for cue delivery and implementation. Where possible, we make suggestions for current best practices in each category while identifying gaps in knowledge and potential areas of future research. Finally, we conclude by using the NIH Stage model to better frame the current state of the literature on EFT and propose gaps to be addressed if EFT is to be both an efficacious and effective behavioral intervention.

Keywords: delay discounting; episodic future thinking; health behavior change; methods; narrative review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example data, replotted from Stein et al. (10), showing effects of an episodic future thinking (EFT) intervention on delay discounting (left) and the number of cigarette puffs earned during a self-administration task (right) in cigarette smokers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recreation of Figure 1 from Onken et al. (72). Depiction of the NIH stage model. Notched arrows denote pathways that should be considered with caution.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atance CM, O'Neill DK. Episodic future thinking. Trends Cogn Sci. (2001) 5:533–9. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01804-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madden GJ, Johnson PS. A delay-discounting primer. In:Madden GG, Bickel WK. editors. Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; (2010). p. 11–37
    1. Bickel WK, Jarmolowicz DP, Mueller ET, Koffarnus MN, Gatchalian KM. Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: emerging evidence. Pharmacol Therap. (2012) 134:287–97. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.02.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amlung M, Petker T, Jackson J, Balodis I, MacKillop J. Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. (2016) 46:2423–34. 10.1017/S0033291716000866 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bickel WK, Freitas-Lemos R, Tomlinson DC, Craft WH, Keith DR, Athamneh LN, et al. . Temporal discounting as a candidate behavioral marker of obesity. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2021) 129:307–29. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.035 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources