Flow diversion treatment for giant intracranial serpentine aneurysms
- PMID: 36408107
- PMCID: PMC9669791
- DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.988411
Flow diversion treatment for giant intracranial serpentine aneurysms
Abstract
Background: Giant serpentine aneurysms (GSAs) are among the most complex and challenging type of intracranial aneurysms. Surgical clipping, bypass, or endovascular parent artery occlusion has been the main treatment of GSAs in the past. However, studies on flow diversion (FD) are limited. Therefore, we reported our experience with patients with GSAs treated with FD.
Methods: Patients with GSAs treated with FD from 2012 to 2020 in our single center were retrospectively reviewed. Angiographic outcomes were graded according to the O'Kelly-Marotta scale as complete occlusion (D), trace filling (C), entry remnant (B), or aneurysm filling (A). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. We also collected the patients' treatment details and perioperative complications.
Results: Thirteen patients with 14 aneurysms were included, including three in the anterior circulation and 11 in the posterior circulation. Grades B-D were found in 72.7% (8/11) of the GSAs. Good prognosis (mRS score, 0-2) was found in 66.7% (8/12) and 50.0% (6/12) of the patients at the 6-month and latest follow-up, respectively. Parent artery occlusion was found in three cases of GSAs. Five postoperative complications were observed, including two minor complications and three major complications.
Conclusion: Although reconstructive treatment with FD could be considered as one of the treatment strategies for patients with both anterior and posterior circulation GSAs, however, the risk of complications and parent artery occlusion should be considered.
Keywords: angiographic outcome; clinical outcome; complication; flow diversion; giant serpentine aneurysm.
Copyright © 2022 Tong, He, Han, Feng, Duan and Liu.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Postprocedural, midterm, and long-term results of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverter devices: 7-year experience at a single center.Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1732. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28565988
-
Treatment of Distal Anterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysms with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Single-Center Experience.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jun;39(6):1100-1106. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5615. Epub 2018 Apr 12. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 29650782 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical characteristics and endovascular treatment in patients with intracranial giant serpentine aneurysms.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Apr;11(4):1490-1495. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-698. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021. Retraction in: Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):2737. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-01. PMID: 33816185 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms treated with flow diversion: experience of a large-volume center and systematic review of the literature.J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Jan;13(1):42-48. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015980. Epub 2020 May 26. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021. PMID: 32457222
-
Complex intracranial aneurysms: combined operative and endovascular approaches.Neurosurgery. 1998 Dec;43(6):1304-12; discussion 1312-3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199812000-00020. Neurosurgery. 1998. PMID: 9848843 Review.
Cited by
-
Comprehensive Evaluation of Serpentine Aneurysms: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with a Subanalysis for Treatment Approaches.Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec;34(4):749-760. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01460-w. Epub 2024 Sep 24. Clin Neuroradiol. 2024. PMID: 39316117 English.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous