Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 3:14:988411.
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.988411. eCollection 2022.

Flow diversion treatment for giant intracranial serpentine aneurysms

Affiliations

Flow diversion treatment for giant intracranial serpentine aneurysms

Xin Tong et al. Front Aging Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background: Giant serpentine aneurysms (GSAs) are among the most complex and challenging type of intracranial aneurysms. Surgical clipping, bypass, or endovascular parent artery occlusion has been the main treatment of GSAs in the past. However, studies on flow diversion (FD) are limited. Therefore, we reported our experience with patients with GSAs treated with FD.

Methods: Patients with GSAs treated with FD from 2012 to 2020 in our single center were retrospectively reviewed. Angiographic outcomes were graded according to the O'Kelly-Marotta scale as complete occlusion (D), trace filling (C), entry remnant (B), or aneurysm filling (A). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. We also collected the patients' treatment details and perioperative complications.

Results: Thirteen patients with 14 aneurysms were included, including three in the anterior circulation and 11 in the posterior circulation. Grades B-D were found in 72.7% (8/11) of the GSAs. Good prognosis (mRS score, 0-2) was found in 66.7% (8/12) and 50.0% (6/12) of the patients at the 6-month and latest follow-up, respectively. Parent artery occlusion was found in three cases of GSAs. Five postoperative complications were observed, including two minor complications and three major complications.

Conclusion: Although reconstructive treatment with FD could be considered as one of the treatment strategies for patients with both anterior and posterior circulation GSAs, however, the risk of complications and parent artery occlusion should be considered.

Keywords: angiographic outcome; clinical outcome; complication; flow diversion; giant serpentine aneurysm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An adult patient with a 20 mm × 29 mm vertebrobasilar artery junction serpentine aneurysm. The preoperative, intraoperative, immediate postoperative, and latest follow-up angiography images are shown in A–D.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An adult patient with a 17 mm × 28 mm vertebrobasilar artery serpentine aneurysm. The preoperative, intraoperative, immediate postoperative, and latest follow-up angiography images are shown in A–D.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alwakeal A., Shlobin N. A., Golnari P., Metcalf-Doetsch W., Nazari P., Ansari S. A., et al. (2021). Flow diversion of posterior circulation aneurysms: systematic review of disaggregated individual patient data. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 42, 1827–1833. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7220 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anson J. A., Lawton M. T., Spetzler R. F. (1996). Characteristics and surgical treatment of dolichoectatic and fusiform aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 84, 185–193. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0185, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakaç G., Gholkar A., Mendelow A. D. (1997). Delayed aneurysm formation following surgery for a giant serpentine aneurysm. Br. J. Neurosurg. 11, 260–263. doi: 10.1080/02688699746384, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carneiro A., Rane N., Küker W., Cellerini M., Corkill R., Byrne J. V. (2014). Volume changes of extremely large and giant intracranial aneurysms after treatment with flow diverter stents. Neuroradiology 56, 51–58. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1304-0, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Civlan S., Yakar F., Coskun M. E., Sato K. (2022). Endovascular occlusion of giant serpentine aneurysm: a case report and literature review. J. Cerebrovasc. Endovasc. Neurosurg. 24, 51–57. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2022.E2021.06.003, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed