Conservation ethics in the time of the pandemic: Does increasing remote access advance social justice?
- PMID: 36408461
- PMCID: PMC9643013
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109788
Conservation ethics in the time of the pandemic: Does increasing remote access advance social justice?
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is stimulating improvements in remote access and use of technology in conservation-related programs and research. In many cases, organizations have intended for remote engagement to benefit groups that have been marginalized in the sciences. But are they? It is important to consider how remote access affects social justice in conservation biology-i.e., the principle that all people should be equally respected and valued in conservation organizations, programs, projects, and practices. To support such consideration, we describe a typology of justice-oriented principles that can be used to examine social justice in a range of conservation activities. We apply this typology to three conservation areas: (1) remote access to US national park educational programs and data; (2) digitization of natural history specimens and their use in conservation research; and (3) remote engagement in conservation-oriented citizen science. We then address the questions: Which justice-oriented principles are salient in which conservation contexts or activities? How can those principles be best realized in those contexts or activities? In each of the three areas we examined, remote access increased participation, but access and benefits were not equally distributed and unanticipated consequences have not been adequately addressed. We identify steps that can and are being taken to advance social justice in conservation, such as assessing programs to determine if they are achieving their stated social justice-oriented aims and revising initiatives as needed. The framework that we present could be used to assess the social justice dimensions of many conservation programs, institutions, practices, and policies.
Keywords: Citizen science; Digitization; Museum specimens; National parks; Remote access; Social justice.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Alender B. Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring. J. Sci. Commun. 2016;15:A04.
-
- Anderson J., Hudson M. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. Vol. 4. 2020. The biocultural labels initiative: supporting indigenous rights in data derived from genetic resources.
-
- Aristeidou M., Herodotou C. Online citizen science: a systematic review of effects on learning and scientific literacy. Citizen Sci. Theory Pract. 2020;5:1–12.
-
- Basl J., Sandler R., Tiell S. Atlantic Council; 2021. Getting From Commitment to Content in AI and Data Ethics: Justice and Explainability.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources