Dose-response association between transportation noise exposure and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
- PMID: 36408740
- DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3595
Dose-response association between transportation noise exposure and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Abstract
Aims: To examine the longitudinal association between transportation noise exposure (road traffic, aircraft, and railway noise) and T2D in a meta-analysis.
Materials and methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science published up to February 2022. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the study quality, and the pooled effect estimate was calculated by the fixed-effects model or the random-effects model.
Results: We included 10 prospective studies with a total of 4,994,171 participants and 417,332 T2D cases in the meta-analysis. According to the Navigation guide, 8 studies out of 10 were rated as having a probably high or high risk of bias. For road noise, the pooled relative risk (RR) per 10 dB higher Lden for developing T2D was 1.06 (95% CI:1.03, 1.09) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 90.1%, p < 0.001). Similar associations were also observed in aircraft and railway noise: the pooled RR were separately were: 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) and 1.02 (1.01, 1.03) separately. A 'dose-response' analysis found a similar linear association between road noise exposure and the risk of T2D.
Conclusions: An overall 6% increase in the risk of T2D per 10 dB increase in road exposure was observed. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings, especially for aircraft and railway noise, and to identify the mechanisms involved.
Keywords: aircraft noise; diabetes mellitus; meta-analysis; railway noise; road noise.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211-1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32154-2
-
- World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Accessed at. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
-
- Moore P. Type 2 diabetes is a major drain on resources. Bmj. 2000;320(7237):732. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.732
-
- Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D. Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):855-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x
-
- Seino Y, Nanjo K, Tajima N, et al. Report of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2010;1(5):212-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00074.x
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
