A systematic review of new empirical data on lucid dream induction techniques
- PMID: 36408823
- DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13786
A systematic review of new empirical data on lucid dream induction techniques
Abstract
Lucid dreams are defined as dreams in which the dreamers are aware of the fact that they are dreaming as dreams continue. It has been ~12 years since the last review of the efficiency of lucid dream induction techniques was conducted. Hence, the present study aimed to review the lucid dream induction techniques published in the past decade. The second aim was to propose a modified classification for the existing lucid dream induction techniques, including cognitive techniques, external stimulation, substance intervention, and cortical stimulation. The third aim was to assess the methodological quality of the studies included in the review. It was hypothesised that, comparing with the studies included in the last review, the studies included in the present review had better overall methodological quality. A total of 19 peer-reviewed studies were included and analysed in the present review, from which 14 lucid dream induction techniques were identified. The results indicated that the mnemonic induction of lucid dream technique was the most effective for inducing lucid dreams. Moreover, two new techniques, the senses-initiated lucid dream technique and galantamine intervention, might also be competitive candidates for lucid dream induction but further replications are needed. As hypothesised, the overall methodological quality of the studies included in the present review was higher than that of the studies included the previous review. In all, 17 studies had moderate methodological quality, whereas only three studies had poor methodological quality.
Keywords: classification; induction methods; lucid dreaming.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Sleep Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Sleep Research Society.
Similar articles
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Induction of lucid dreams: a systematic review of evidence.Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1456-75. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Jul 28. Conscious Cogn. 2012. PMID: 22841958
Cited by
-
New strategies for the cognitive science of dreaming.Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Dec;28(12):1105-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.10.004. Epub 2024 Nov 4. Trends Cogn Sci. 2024. PMID: 39500684 Review.
-
Neuropsychopharmacological Induction of (Lucid) Dreams: A Narrative Review.Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 25;14(5):426. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050426. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 38790404 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Provoking lucid dreams at home with sensory cues paired with pre-sleep cognitive training.Conscious Cogn. 2024 Oct;125:103759. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103759. Epub 2024 Sep 14. Conscious Cogn. 2024. PMID: 39278157
-
Frequent Lucid Dreaming Is Associated with Meditation Practice Styles, Meta-Awareness, and Trait Mindfulness.Brain Sci. 2024 May 14;14(5):496. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050496. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 38790474 Free PMC article.
-
Electrophysiological Correlates of Lucid Dreaming: Sensor and Source Level Signatures.J Neurosci. 2025 May 14;45(20):e2237242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2237-24.2025. J Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40258661
References
REFERENCES
-
- Appel, K., Füllhase, S., Kern, S., Kleinschmidt, A., Laukemper, A., Lüth, K., Steinmetz, L., & Vogelsang, L. (2020). Inducing signal-verified lucid dreams in 40% of untrained novice lucid dreamers within two nights in a sleep laboratory setting. Consciousness and Cognition, 83, 102960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102960
-
- Aspy, D. J. (2020). Findings from the international lucid dream induction study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01746
-
- Aspy, D. J., Delfabbro, P., Proeve, M., & Mohr, P. (2017). Reality testing and the mnemonic induction of lucid dreams: Findings from the National Australian Lucid Dream Induction Study. Dreaming, 27(3), 206-231. https://doi.org/10.1037/drm0000059
-
- Baird, B., Riedner, B. A., Boly, M., Davidson, R. J., & Tononi, G. (2019). Increased lucid dream frequency in long-term meditators but not following mindfulness-based stress reduction training. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000176
-
- Blanchette-Carrière, C., Julien, S.-H., Picard-Deland, C., Bouchard, M., Carrier, J., Paquette, T., & Nielsen, T. (2020). Attempted induction of signalled lucid dreaming by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 83, 102957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102957
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous