Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 15;41(24):e112677.
doi: 10.15252/embj.2022112677. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

Cholesterol transfer via endoplasmic reticulum contacts mediates lysosome damage repair

Affiliations

Cholesterol transfer via endoplasmic reticulum contacts mediates lysosome damage repair

Maja Radulovic et al. EMBO J. .

Abstract

Lysosome integrity is essential for cell viability, and lesions in lysosome membranes are repaired by the ESCRT machinery. Here, we describe an additional mechanism for lysosome repair that is activated independently of ESCRT recruitment. Lipidomic analyses showed increases in lysosomal phosphatidylserine and cholesterol after damage. Electron microscopy demonstrated that lysosomal membrane damage is rapidly followed by the formation of contacts with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which depends on the ER proteins VAPA/B. The cholesterol-binding protein ORP1L was recruited to damaged lysosomes, accompanied by cholesterol accumulation by a mechanism that required VAP-ORP1L interactions. The PtdIns 4-kinase PI4K2A rapidly produced PtdIns4P on lysosomes upon damage, and knockout of PI4K2A inhibited damage-induced accumulation of ORP1L and cholesterol and led to the failure of lysosomal membrane repair. The cholesterol-PtdIns4P transporter OSBP was also recruited upon damage, and its depletion caused lysosomal accumulation of PtdIns4P and resulted in cell death. We conclude that ER contacts are activated on damaged lysosomes in parallel to ESCRTs to provide lipids for membrane repair, and that PtdIns4P generation and removal are central in this response.

Keywords: cholesterol; lysosome; membrane contact site; membrane repair; phosphoinositide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure EV1
Figure EV1. LLOMe treatment alters lysosomal lipid composition
  1. Representative western blot showing purity of immuno‐affinity purified lysosomal (LAMP1+) and negative control (IgG Control) treated with 250‐μM LLOMe for 0, 10 min, and 45 min. Membrane was probed using anti‐TOM20 and anti‐Calnexin antibodies to verify the absence of mitochondrial and ER membrane, respectively. Enrichment of lysosomes was judged by using an anti‐LAMP1 antibody.

  2. Numbers of lipid species identified in the produced WCLs and LAMP1+ fraction, belonging to the lipid categories of glycerophospholipids (GPL), sphingolipids (SL), and sterol lipids (ST).

  3. Total molar quantities of lipids identified in aliquots of the whole‐cell lysates (WCL) produced during lysosome purification.

  4. Mol% values of the cardiolipin (CL) and bis(monoacylglycero)phosphate/phosphatidylglycerol (BMP/PG) classes in the LAMP1+ fraction and WCL of untreated HeLa cells. BMP and PG classes are isobaric and reported together as BMP/PG.

  5. Enrichment of individual BMP/PG species after purification (log2‐transformed fold change, mol% in LAMP1+: mol% in WCL) presented as box plots with individual species as circles, the central band representing the median, the box the upper and lower quartiles, and the whiskers the highest and lowest values. Species are grouped according to the total number of acyl double bonds.

  6. Enrichment of monitored lipid classes (log2‐transformed fold change, mol% in LAMP1+: mol% in WCL) after purification of lysosomes from untreated cells, presented in a heatmap. The bar plot depicts the percentage of species in the individual classes having positive or negative values of log2 fold changes.

  7. Representative mass spectra of three PtdInsP species. Precursor ions detected in the MS1 and their theoretical m/z values (MS1) and MS2 spectra obtained after their fragmentations, displaying the relative intensities of the ions.

Data information: Bars and error bars denote mean ± SD from n = 3–4 independently performed purifications. Multiple t‐tests were performed to assess changes between means of pmol (C) and mol% values and log2‐transformed mol% values (D–F). Resultant P‐values were corrected for multiple testing using Benjamini–Hochberg correction and differences were considered statistically significantly changed with adjusted P‐values (q‐values) of 0.05 or less. *q < 0.05; **q < 0.01. Abbreviations: FA, fatty acid; glycerolP, glycerol phosphate; InsP, phosphorylinositol headgroup. Additional abbreviations are as in Fig 1.
Figure EV2
Figure EV2. Mol% of lipid classes in whole‐cell lysates (WCL) and purified lysosomes (LAMP1+ fractions)
Mol% of all monitored lipid classes in the WCLs and LAMP1+ fractions from cells untreated or treated with LLOMe for 10 or 45 min. Data information: Bars and error bars denote mean ± SD from n = 3–4 independently performed purifications. Multiple t‐tests were performed to assess changes between means. Resultant P‐values were corrected for multiple testing using Benjamini–Hochberg correction and differences were considered statistically significantly changed with adjusted P‐values (q‐values) of 0.05 or less. *q < 0.05. Abbreviations are as in Fig 1.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Lysosome lipid composition is altered upon membrane damage
  1. Total molar quantity of lipids identified in the produced LAMP1‐positive (LAMP1+) and the corresponding IgG negative control fractions, produced from HeLa cells treated with LLOMe for 0, 10, or 45 min.

  2. Molar percentages (mol%) values of lipid categories of glycerophospholipids (GPL), sphingolipids (SL), and sterol lipids (ST) in the LAMP1+ fractions and the corresponding whole‐cell lysate (WCL).

  3. LLOMe‐induced fold change (log2‐transformed) in the mol% values of lipid classes in the WCLs and LAMP1+ fractions, in the first 10 min (mol% at 10 min: mol% at 0 min) and the following 45 min (mol% at 45 min: mol% at 10 min) of treatment.

  4. Mol% values of diacyl‐GPL lipid classes phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylserine (PS), and cholesterol (Chol) in the LAMP1+ fractions.

  5. Mean total numbers of acyl double bonds in the PC and PS classes in the WCLs and LAMP1+ fractions.

  6. Ion intensities of dehydrated phosphorylinositol headgroup recorded in MS2 after fragmentation of [M‐2H]2− ions of phosphatidylinositol phosphate (PtdInsP) species detected in the negative ion mode MS1. Intensities measured in the four replicates are displayed in individual rows.

Data information: Bars and error bars denote mean ± SD from n = 3–4 independently performed purifications. Multiple t‐tests were performed to assess changes between means of pmol (A), lipid quantities in mol% (B–D), or the mean total numbers of double bonds in diacyl‐GPL classes (E). Resultant P‐values were corrected for multiple testing using Benjamini–Hochberg correction and differences were considered statistically significantly changed with adjusted P‐values (q‐values) of 0.05 or less. *q < 0.05; **q < 0.01; ***q < 0.001. Heatmaps are for simplicity only fitted with a single asterisk regardless of the magnitude of the q‐value. Additional abbreviations: BMP, bismonophosphatidic acid; CE, cholesteryl ester; Cer, ceramide; CerP, ceramide‐1‐phosphate; CL, cardiolipin; diHexCer, dihexosylceramide; GM3, ganglioside GM3; HexCer, hexosylceramide; LPA, lyso‐phosphatidic acid; LPC, lysoPC; LPC O‐, alkyl‐LPC; LPE, lysoPE; LPE O‐, alkyl‐LPE; LPG, lysoPG; LPI, lysoPI; LPS, lysoPS; PC O‐, acyl‐alkyl‐PC; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine, PE O‐, acyl‐alkyl‐PE; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PI, phosphatidylinositol; SM, sphingomyelin; triHexCer, trihexosylceramide.
Figure EV3
Figure EV3. Mean total numbers of double bonds in whole‐cell lysates (WCLs) and purified lysosomal fractions (LAMP1+ fractions)
Mean total numbers of double bonds in the monitored lipid classes in the WCLs and LAMP1+ fractions from cells untreated or treated with LLOMe for 10 or 45 min. The double bonds are in the acyl (alkyl) groups of glycerophospholipids and sterol lipids, and in the acyl group and long‐chain base groups of sphingolipids. Data information: Bars and error bars denote mean ± SD from n = 3–4 independently performed purifications. Multiple t‐tests were performed to assess changes between means. Resultant P‐values were corrected for multiple testing using Benjamini–Hochberg correction and differences were considered statistically significantly changed with adjusted P‐values (q‐values) of 0.05 or less. *q < 0.05; **q < 0.01; ***q < 0.001. Abbreviations are as in Fig 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lysosome damage induces VAP‐dependent ER–Lysosome contacts
  1. Representative electron micrographs of HeLa cells treated or not with 250 μM LLOMe for 5 or 10 min before chemical fixation. Cells were incubated for 4 h following washing steps and overnight incubation with 15‐nm gold nanoparticles conjugated to bovine serum albumin to visualize lysosomes (black spots inside lysosomes are internalized gold nanoparticles) before treatment with LLOMe and processing of samples for electron microscopy. Arrows indicate areas with increased lysosome–ER contacts.

  2. Quantification of electron micrographs showing an increase in membrane contact sites between ER and lysosomes following 250‐μM LLOMe treatment for 5 or 10 min. Error bars denote ± SD from n = 3 independent experiments, > 48 lysosomes were quantified per experiment for each condition. Statistical significance was determined using one‐way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparisons test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

  3. Representative electron micrographs of VAP double knockout HeLa cells that were either left untreated or incubated with 250 μM LLOMe for 5 or 10 min before chemical fixation. Cells were incubated with 15‐nm gold nanoparticles conjugated to bovine serum albumin for 4 h to visualize lysosomes. After 4 h, gold nanoparticles were washed off and cells were incubated overnight before treatment with LLOMe and processing samples for electron microscopy (same as in A). Quantification of electron micrographs showing no increase in membrane contact sites between ER and lysosomes following 250‐μM LLOMe treatment for 5 or 10 min in VAP double knockout cells. Error bars denote ± SD from n = 3 independent experiments, > 40 lysosomes were quantified per experiment for each condition. Statistical significance was determined using one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test, *P < 0.05, ns = not statistically significant.

  4. Representative movie stills of a live‐cell imaging experiment illustrating the recruitment of transiently expressed eGFP‐ORP1L to lysosomes following 250‐μM LLOMe treatment. Cells were pre‐treated for 30 min with 75 nM Lysotracker Deep Red to monitor lysosome damage (judged by the decreased number of Lysotracker spots after LLOMe treatment). The graph represents the quantification of eGFP‐ORP1L foci per cell after LLOMe treatment. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 3 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 25 cells were analyzed per experiment.

Figure 3
Figure 3. ORP1L is recruited by PI4K2A‐dependent accumulation of PtdIns4P on damaged lysosomes
  1. Movie stills from a live‐cell imaging experiment showing rapid 2xSidM‐eGFP recruitment to damaged lysosomes upon 250‐μM LLOMe treatment (indicated in green). Lysosomes were visualized using transiently overexpressed LAMP1‐mCherry (indicated in red). Yellow spots show colocalized PtdIns4P probe (2xSidM‐eGFP) and LAMP1‐mCherry after 3 and 10 min of LLOMe treatment. The graph shows the quantification of 2xSidM‐eGFP foci per cell after LLOMe treatment. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 3 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 20 cells were analyzed per experiment.

  2. HeLa cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNA targeting PI4K2A or PI4K2B for 48 h (KD efficiency is shown in Fig EV5C) and transiently transfected with the 2xSidM‐eGFP probe to monitor PtdIns4P recruitment after LLOMe treatment by live‐cell imaging. Representative movie stills show the dynamics of 2xSidM‐eGFP recruitment in control, PI4K2A, and PI4K2B depleted cells. The graph represents the quantification of 2xSidM‐eGFP foci per cell after LLOMe treatment. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 3 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 25 cells were analyzed per experiment for each condition.

  3. CRISPR‐Cas9‐mediated knockout of PI4K2A abolishes recruitment of the 2xSidM‐eGFP probe (PtdIns4P) to damaged lysosomes. Two different clones (clone 2 and clone 3) were tested. The graph represents the quantification of 2xSidM‐eGFP foci per cell after LLOMe treatment. Error bars denote ± SD from n = 2 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 20 cells were analyzed per experiment for each condition.

  4. Representative movie stills from live fluorescence microscopy showing reduced eGFP‐ORP1L recruitment in PI4K2A knockout cells compared to wild‐type HeLa cells upon treatment with 250‐μM LLOMe. The graph represents the quantification of eGFP‐ORP1L foci per cell after LLOMe treatment. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 4 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 80 cells were analyzed per experiment for each condition.

Figure EV4
Figure EV4. A targeted mini‐screen for recruitment of phosphoinositides to damaged lysosomes
Representative movie montages of live‐cell imaging experiments using mCherry‐tagged lipid probes in HeLa cells stably expressing CHMP4B‐eGFP. P40PX was used for the detection of PtdIns3P, SidM for the detection of PtdIns4P, mL1N for the detection of PtdIns(3,5)P2, and PLCδ‐PH for the detection of PtdIns(4,5)P2. CHMP4B‐eGFP was used as a positive control for lysosomal damage. Scale bar: 5 μm.
Figure EV5
Figure EV5. PI4K3A and PI4K3B do not mediate PtdIns4P recruitment at damaged lysosomes
  1. Movie stills from live‐cell imaging experiments of HeLa cells transiently expressing the PtdIns4P probe 2xSidM‐eGFP and the lysosomal marker LAMP1‐mCherry. Cells were incubated with 10‐nM PI4K3A inhibitor GSK‐A1 for approximately 16 min before 250‐μM LLOMe was added.

  2. Movie stills from live‐cell imaging experiments of HeLa cells transiently expressing the PtdIns4P probe 2xSidM‐eGFP and the lysosomal marker LAMP1‐mCherry. Cells were incubated with 25‐nM PI4K3B inhibitor PI4K3B‐IN‐10 for approximately 30 min before 250‐μM LLOMe was added.

  3. Knockdown efficiency of siRNA against PI4K2A or CRISPR‐Cas9‐mediated knockout of PI4K2A (clone 2 and clone 3) as detected by western blot using an anti‐PI4K2A antibody. β‐actin used as a loading control.

  4. Exogenous expression of PI4K2A‐mNG and the PtdIns4P probe SidM‐mCherry in clone 2 and clone 3 of PI4K2A‐KO cells shows recruitment of SidM‐mCherry after incubation with 250‐μM LLOMe.

Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure 4
Figure 4. PI4K2A mediates lysosome repair
Representative movie stills from live‐cell imaging experiments monitoring Lysotracker recovery after induced lysosomal damage using 250 μM LLOMe. Cells were pre‐treated with 75‐nM Lysotracker Deep Red for 30 min before the addition of LLOMe. The graph represents the quantification of bright Lysotracker‐positive foci per cell. While the decrease in the number of Lysotracker spots is quickly recovering in HeLa cells, there is a severe impairment in lysosomal repair in HeLa‐PI4K2A‐KO cells. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 3 independent experiments, > 217 cells were analyzed per experiment for each condition.
Figure 5
Figure 5. The PI4K2A‐mediated lysosome repair pathway is activated independently of ESCRTs
  1. HeLa cells were co‐transfected with siRNAs targeting ESCRT proteins TSG101 and ALIX (siTSG101 + siALIX) or with non‐targeting siRNA control (siControl) and incubated for 24 h before transfection with the PtdIns4P binding probe 2xSidM‐eGFP. Twenty‐four‐hour post‐transfection, lysosomes were damaged with 250‐μM LLOMe and PtdIns4P recruitment to damaged lysosomes was monitored using the 2xSidM‐eGFP probe in live‐cell imaging experiments. The graph shows the quantification of 2xSidM‐eGFP foci per cell in cells co‐depleted of TSG101 + ALIX and control (siControl) cells. Error bars denote ± SD from n = 2 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 27 cells were analyzed per experiment for each condition.

  2. Representative fluorescence micrographs of HeLa‐PI4K2A knockout cells treated with 250‐μM LLOMe or an equal volume of DMSO (Pre) for 5 min, 15 min, and 1 h before fixation and immunostained with Hoechst (blue), anti‐CHMP4B (red), anti‐GAL3 (green), and anti‐ALIX (white).

Figure EV6
Figure EV6. Knockdown efficiency of TSG101 or ALIX
Knockdown efficiency of siRNA oligonucleotides for TSG101 or ALIX as detected by western blot using anti‐TSG101 or anti‐ALIX antibodies. β‐actin used as a loading control.Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure EV7
Figure EV7. ESCRT and GAL3 recruitment to damaged lysosomes
Representative fluorescence micrographs of parental HeLa cells treated with 250‐μM LLOMe or an equal volume of DMSO (Pre) for 5 min, 15 min, and 1 h before fixation and immunostained with Hoechst (blue), anti‐CHMP4B (red), anti‐GAL3 (green), and anti‐ALIX (white) (Fig 5B).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Cholesterol accumulation on damaged lysosomes depends on PI4K2A, VAPA/B, and ORP1L
  1. Representative movie stills of a live‐cell imaging experiment illustrate faster recruitment of the PtdIns4P probe 2xSidM‐eGFP to damaged lysosomes when compared to cholesterol as indicated by the mCherry‐D4 probe. The graph shows the quantification of 2xSidM‐eGFP and mCherry‐D4 foci per cell. Error bars denote ± SD from n = 2 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 26 cells were analyzed per experiment for each condition.

  2. Graph showing quantification of mCherry‐D4 and 2xSidM‐eGFP foci per cell in parental HeLa cells (Ctrl) and PI4K2A knockout cells (PI4K2A‐KO). Error bars correspond to ± SEM from n = 3 independent experiments, > 30 cells per condition were analyzed.

  3. Quantification graph of 2xSidM‐eGFP and mCherry‐D4 foci per cell in HeLa and VAP double knockout cells. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 3 independent experiments, > 30 cells per condition were analyzed.

  4. HeLa cells expressing an eGFP‐tagged ORP1L mutant incapable of binding to VAP (mFFAT) show no accumulation of the cholesterol reporter mCherry‐D4 upon lysosomal damage induced with 250‐μM LLOMe when compared to wild‐type (wt) eGFP‐ORP1L. The quantification graph shows D4‐mCherry foci per cell. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 4 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 50 cells were analyzed per experiment for each condition.

Figure 7
Figure 7. Cholesterol accumulation protects lysosomes from damage
  1. Representative movie stills from live‐cell imaging experiments indicate recruitment of CHMP4B‐eGFP to damaged lysosomes in control and U18666A‐treated cells. HeLa cells stably expressing CHMP4B‐eGFP were treated with 2 μM U18666A for 17 h before treatment with 250‐μM LLOMe. The graph shows the quantification of CHMP4B‐eGFP foci per cell. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 4, > 30 cells per experiment for each condition.

  2. Representative immunofluorescence images illustrate Galectin‐3 recruitment kinetics on the damaged lysosomes upon treatment with 2 μM U18666A for 17 h. HeLa cells were treated or not (Control) with U18666A and ± LLOMe for the indicated time points, fixed, and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy. Endogenous levels of Galectin‐3 were visualized.

  3. Number of Galectin‐3‐positive dots per cell was automatically quantified from the dataset described in (B). Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 3 independent experiments. > 225 cells were analyzed per condition, and distribution was visualized as violin plots. One‐way ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparisons test, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ns = not statistically significant.

  4. Representative movie stills from live‐cell imaging experiments indicate recruitment of the PtdIns4P probe 2xSidM‐eGFP to damaged lysosomes in control but not in the U18666A‐treated cells. HeLa cells were treated with 2 μM U18666A for 17 h before treatment with 250‐μM LLOMe. The graph shows the quantification of 2xSidM‐eGFP foci per cell. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 3 independent experiments, > 25 cells per experiment for each condition.

Figure 8
Figure 8. OSBP prevents hyperaccumulation of PtdIns4P on damaged lysosomes, promoting cell viability
  1. Representative movie stills of a live‐cell imaging experiment show recruitment dynamics of transiently expressed eGFP‐OSBP in HeLa cells treated with 250‐μM LLOMe. The graph shows quantifications of OSBP foci per cell. Error bars denote ± SEM from n = 5 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 22 cells per experiment.

  2. Representative movie montage from a live‐cell fluorescence imaging experiment indicating accumulation of the 2xSidM‐eGFP probe and subsequent cell death in cells depleted of OSBP compared to control following treatment with 250‐μM LLOMe.

  3. Kaplan–Meier plot represents a decrease in cell viability in siRNA knockdown of OSBP (HeLa siOSBP) as compared to control cells (HeLa siControl). The rapid cell death observed in HeLa cells depleted of OSBP was ameliorated with PtdIns4P depletion (HeLa‐PI4K2A‐KO siOSBP and HeLa‐PI4K2A‐KO siControl). The graph represents data from n = 3 independent live‐cell imaging experiments, > 100 cells per experiment for each condition.

  4. Knockdown efficiency of siRNA depletion of OSBP in HeLa cells as detected by western blot. β‐actin used as a loading control.

Source data are available online for this figure.
Figure 9
Figure 9. Model for ER‐mediated lysosome repair
Lysosomal membrane damage (1) causes the activation of PI4K2A to produce PtdIns4P on the lysosome membrane. This causes the formation of contact sites via ORP1L, OSBP, and other PtdIns4P‐binding ORP proteins that bind to VAPA/B in the ER membrane via their FFAT motives and to PtdIns4P on the lysosome via their PH domains. Transfer of cholesterol from the ER, mediated by ORP1L, promotes membrane repair (2). Excess PtdIns4P is transported from the lysosome to the ER by OSBP (3) and thereafter dephosphorylated by SAC1 (the latter inferred from Mesmin et al, 2013). The lipid‐binding ORD domains of ORP1L and OSBP are indicated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balla T (2013) Phosphoinositides: tiny lipids with giant impact on cell regulation. Physiol Rev 93: 1019–1137 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballabio A, Bonifacino JS (2020) Lysosomes as dynamic regulators of cell and organismal homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21: 101–118 - PubMed
    1. Bilgin M, Nylandsted J, Jaattela M, Maeda K (2017) Quantitative profiling of lysosomal lipidome by shotgun lipidomics. Methods Mol Biol 1594: 19–34 - PubMed
    1. Boutry M, Kim PK (2021) ORP1L mediated PI(4)P signaling at ER‐lysosome‐mitochondrion three‐way contact contributes to mitochondrial division. Nat Commun 12: 5354 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christ L, Wenzel EM, Liestol K, Raiborg C, Campsteijn C, Stenmark H (2016) ALIX and ESCRT‐I/II function as parallel ESCRT‐III recruiters in cytokinetic abscission. J Cell Biol 212: 499–513 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances