Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;79(2):418-441.
doi: 10.1111/jan.15500. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

Patient-mediated interventions in hospital: A systematic review

Affiliations

Patient-mediated interventions in hospital: A systematic review

Georgia Tobiano et al. J Adv Nurs. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Aims: To describe the characteristics of hospital-based, patient-mediated interventions and their impact on patient, clinician and organization outcomes.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: Health literature databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE) were searched in August 2021. Backward and forward citation searching was conducted.

Review methods: Studies investigating patient-mediated interventions, targeted at adult hospitalized patients were eligible. Data were extracted related to study and intervention characteristics. Narrative synthesis was used to understand intervention impact on patient, clinician and organization outcomes (as per a framework). Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool.

Results: Thirty-three studies, reporting 18 interventions, were included. Twelve interventions prompted patients to report health information about their own health/needs/concerns and six interventions encouraged patients to provide feedback about clinical practice. Across all interventions, there was evidence that patients used patient-mediated interventions and that they may improve patient communication. Healthcare professional outcomes were mixed for actual/intended use, acceptability and usefulness of interventions; yet there was some evidence of healthcare professional behaviour change. Interventions that encouraged patients to report health information about their own health/needs/concerns appeared more successful than other types of interventions.

Conclusions: There is some evidence that hospital-based patient-mediated interventions may influence patient communication and healthcare professional behaviour. Patient-mediated interventions that encourage patients to report patient data before a clinical encounter may be more impactful than interventions that encourage patient feedback during or post-encounter.

Impact: To date, most patient-mediated intervention research has been conducted in primary care settings; we uncovered the types of patient-mediated interventions that have been trialled in hospitals. We found that patient communication and healthcare professional behaviour may be influenced by these patient-mediated interventions. Future researchers could explore the suitability and effectiveness of a wider range of hospital-based patient-mediated interventions.

No patient or public contribution: There was no funding to remunerate a patient/member of the public for this review.

Keywords: change management; health personnel; nurses; patient education as topic; patient engagement; patient participation; patient-mediated; professional practice; quality of health care; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017). Shades of grey: Guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12102
    1. Alzyood, M., Jackson, D., Brooke, J., & Aveyard, H. (2018). An integrative review exploring the perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals towards patient involvement in promoting hand hygiene compliance in the hospital setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(7-8), 1329-1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14305
    1. Banner, D., Bains, M., Carroll, S., Kandola, D. K., Rolfe, D. E., Wong, C., & Graham, I. D. (2019). Patient and public engagement in integrated knowledge translation research: Are we there yet? Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(1), e1-e14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1
    1. Bobay, K. L., Conway-Phillips, R., Hughes, R. G., Costa, L., Bahr, S. J., Siclovan, D., Nuccio, S., & Weiss, M. (2021). Clinical nurses' perspectives on discharge practice changes from participating in a translational research study. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(3), 553-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13171
    1. Bombard, Y., Baker, G. R., Orlando, E., Fancott, C., Bhatia, P., Casalino, S., Onate, K., Denis, J. L., & Pomey, M. P. (2018). Engaging patients to improve quality of care: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 13(1), e1-e22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources