Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 13;78(Suppl 1):S27-S37.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac139.

Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Collaboration Among Multiple Caregivers of Older Adults

Affiliations

Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Collaboration Among Multiple Caregivers of Older Adults

Katrina R Ellis et al. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: In many families, multiple caregivers support older adults living with dementia. Studying collaboration among caregivers requires consideration of conceptual and methodological issues that have not been fully explored. This study presents a framework for conceptualizing caregiver collaboration and an index that captures variation in collaboration among multiple caregivers within care networks.

Methods: We used data from the 2015 waves of the National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) to operationalize collaboration among multiple caregivers (N = 1,298) of 552 care recipients (Mage = 83.69, SD = 7.73; 71.6% women; 47.9% possible/probable dementia; 38.9% people of color).

Results: The care collaboration index considered individual and overlapping contributions while controlling for the size of the care network (caregivers in network responding to NSOC survey) and total network size (number of caregivers in network) in the statistical model. Larger care networks enabled more collaboration, both in general and across most types of tasks (βs > 0.38). Collaboration was greater among those caring for a Black or Hispanic care recipient, both in general and for household and medical/health tasks specifically (βs > 0.11). Collaboration was also greater among those caring for recipients with probable dementia, both in general and for most tasks (βs > 0.11) but not transportation-related tasks (p = .219).

Discussion: Results are examined in the context of care network dynamics and proposed mechanisms linking care collaboration to outcomes for caregivers and recipients. Strengths and limitations of our conceptualization and operationalization of collaboration are discussed.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Caregiving; Collaboration; Social networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual model of collaboration among multiple caregivers.

References

    1. AARP & National Alliance for Caregiving. (2020). Caregiving in the United States 2020. https://www.aarp.org/ppi/info-2020/caregiving-in-the-united-states.html
    1. Ali, T., McAvay, G. J., Monin, J. K., & Gill, T. M. (2022). Patterns of caregiving among older adults with and without dementia: A latent class analysis. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 77(Supplement_1), S74–S85. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab237 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alzheimer’s Association. (2020). 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 16(3), 391–460. doi: 10.1002/alz.12068 - DOI
    1. Andersson, M. A., & Monin, J. K. (2018). Informal care networks in the context of multimorbidity: Size, composition, and associations with recipient psychological well-being. Journal of Aging and Health, 30(4), 641–664. doi: 10.1177/0898264316687623 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnes, L. L. (2008). Perceived discrimination and mortality in a population-based study of older adults. American Journal of Public Health, 98(7), 1241. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114397 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types