Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 21;7(4):e38910.
doi: 10.2196/38910.

Smartphone Apps for Surveillance of Gestational Diabetes: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Smartphone Apps for Surveillance of Gestational Diabetes: Scoping Review

Suzanne Smyth et al. JMIR Diabetes. .

Abstract

Background: Developments and evolutions in the information and communication technology sector have provided a solid foundation for the emergence of mobile health (mHealth) in recent years. The cornerstone to management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the self-management of glycemic indices, dietary intake, and lifestyle adaptations. Given this, it is readily adaptable to incorporation of remote monitoring strategies involving mHealth solutions.

Objective: We sought to examine and assess the available smartphone apps which enable self-monitoring and remote surveillance of GDM with a particular emphasis on the generation of individualized patient feedback.

Methods: Five databases were searched systematically for any studies evaluating mHealth-supported smartphone solutions for GDM management from study inception until January 2022. The studies were screened and assessed for eligibility of inclusion by 2 independent reviewers. Ultimately, 17 studies were included involving 1871 patients across 11 different countries. The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) conceptual framework was adhered to for data extraction and categorization purposes.

Results: All studies analyzed as part of this review facilitated direct uploading of data from the handheld glucometer to the downloaded patient-facing smartphone app. Glycemic data were captured by all studies and were reassuringly found to be either improved or noninferior to extant models of hospital-based care. Feedback was delivered in either an automated fashion through in-app communication from the health care team or facilitated through bidirectional communication with the app and hospital portal. Although resource utilization and cost-effective analyses were reported in some studies, the results were disparate and require more robust analysis. Where patient and staff satisfaction levels were evaluated, the response was overwhelmingly positive for mHealth smartphone-delivered care strategies. Emergency cesarean section rates were reduced; however, elective cesarean sections were comparatively increased among studies where the mode of delivery was assessed. Most reviewed studies did not identify any differences in maternal, perinatal, or neonatal health when app-based care was compared with usual in-person review.

Conclusions: This comprehensive scoping review highlights the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of app-assisted health care for the management of GDM. Although further exploration of the economic benefit is required prior to implementation in a real-world clinical setting, the prospect of smartphone-assisted health care for GDM is hugely promising.

Keywords: apps; diabetes; digital health; gestational diabetes; mHealth; remote feedback; smartphone; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram describing the systematic literature search for studies examining the effect of smartphone app-assisted care associated with remote feedback for GDM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vo V, Auroy L, Sarradon-Eck A. Patients’ perceptions of mHealth apps: meta-ethnographic review of qualitative studies. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 10;7(7):e13817. doi: 10.2196/13817. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Statista Dossier. Statista; 2022. Jun 27, [2022-10-02]. Smartphone market in Europe - statistics and facts. https://www.statista.com/study/40972/smartphone-market-in-europe-statist...
    1. Hirst JE, Mackillop L, Loerup L, Kevat DA, Bartlett K, Gibson O, Kenworthy Y, Levy JC, Tarassenko L, Farmer A. Acceptability and user satisfaction of a smartphone-based, interactive blood glucose management system in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):111–5. doi: 10.1177/1932296814556506. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25361643 1932296814556506 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu Y, Yao Xun, Vespasiani Giacomo, Nicolucci Antonio, Dong Yajie, Kwong Joey, Li Ling, Sun Xin, Tian Haoming, Li Sheyu. Mobile app-based interventions to support diabetes self-management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to identify functions associated with glycemic efficacy. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Mar 14;5(3):e35. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6522. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2017/3/e35/ v5i3e35 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eberle C, Loehnert M, Stichling S. Clinical effectiveness of different technologies for diabetes in pregnancy: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 28;23(4):e24982. doi: 10.2196/24982. https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e24982/ v23i4e24982 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources