Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of PanbioTM Abbott SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test for the detection of COVID-19 from suspects attending ALERT center
- PMID: 36413550
- PMCID: PMC9681070
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277779
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of PanbioTM Abbott SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test for the detection of COVID-19 from suspects attending ALERT center
Erratum in
-
Correction: Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of PanbioTM Abbott SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test for the detection of COVID-19 from suspects attending ALERT center.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0307338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307338. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38995947 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: The emergence and rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a potentially lethal disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is causing public health issues around the world. In resource-constrained nations, rapid Abbott SARS-CoV-2 antigen test kits are critical for addressing diagnostic gaps in health institutions and community screening. However, there is no evidence or proof of diagnostic performance in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of PanbioTM Abbott SARS-CoV-2antigen rapid test kit to the gold standard, RT-PCR, in COVID-19 patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of COVID-19.
Method: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2021 and April 2022, on 120 suspected patients recruited from outpatient, emergency, and intensive care units in one of the tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from suspected cases and were tested using the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 kit, a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and compared to the reference standard RT-PCR.
Result: The sensitivity and specificity of the RDT were 74.2% and 100%, respectively. A total of 62 samples (51.6%) were RT-PCR positive. Of these, 46 were Ag-RDT positive. Sensitivity among symptomatic patients was 79.4% (95% CI 68.3-90). The Abbot RDT and RT-PCR had a Kappa value of agreement of 0.735 (p < 0.001). These values were acceptable when compared to the WHO's suggested thresholds.
Conclusion: The finding from this study support the use of the Abbot RDT as a diagnostic tool in COVID-19 suspects, mainly in those with higher viral loads.
Copyright: © 2022 Ashagre et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
A Multicenter Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy Study of SureStatus, an Affordable, WHO Emergency Use-Listed, Rapid, Point-Of-Care Antigen-Detecting Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0122922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01229-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 36066256 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen detection rapid diagnostic test among healthcare workers in elderly care.PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0276244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276244. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36827362 Free PMC article.
-
Analytical performance of the point-of-care BIOSYNEX COVID-19 Ag BSS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in nasopharyngeal swabs: a prospective field evaluation during the COVID-19 third wave in France.Infection. 2022 Jun;50(3):625-633. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01723-5. Epub 2021 Oct 24. Infection. 2022. PMID: 34689310 Free PMC article.
-
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33502003 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic evaluation of Panbio™ antigen rapid diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Virol Methods. 2023 Nov;321:114811. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114811. Epub 2023 Sep 9. J Virol Methods. 2023. PMID: 37696303
Cited by
-
An Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Three COVID-19 Rapid Immunochromatographic Test Kits Compared to Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Among Clinical Samples.Cureus. 2024 Jun 27;16(6):e63294. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63294. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39070382 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid Antigen Tests during the COVID-19 Era in Korea and Their Implementation as a Detection Tool for Other Infectious Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;10(3):322. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030322. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36978713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the performance of Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 at Harar, Eastern Ethiopia.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 31;10:1135027. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1135027. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37324158 Free PMC article.
-
Correction: Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of PanbioTM Abbott SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test for the detection of COVID-19 from suspects attending ALERT center.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0307338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307338. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38995947 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 recombinase polymerase amplification assay with lateral flow readout and duplexed full process internal control.Sens Diagn. 2024 Jan 12;3(3):421-430. doi: 10.1039/d3sd00246b. eCollection 2024 Mar 14. Sens Diagn. 2024. PMID: 38495597 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO, Recommendations for national SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies and diagnostic capacities: interim guidance. 2021; (https://covid19.who.int/region/amro/country/us). (https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/et).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous