Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Nov 22;15(11):e250890.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-250890.

Management of early graft candidiasis in a kidney transplant recipient

Affiliations
Case Reports

Management of early graft candidiasis in a kidney transplant recipient

Jaimee Tan et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Balancing adequate immunosuppression with the risk of infection after renal transplantation remains a challenge. The presence of comorbidities adds to the challenge. Although infrequent, invasive fungal infections result in high morbidity and mortality risk in renal transplant recipients. This can be attributed to the intense immunosuppression in the first 6 months after renal transplantation, minimal symptomatology and the high mortality associated with fungal infections.Due to minimal available evidence, clinical judgement guides management of graft candidiasis. There is a need to develop evidence-based management guidelines for the treatment of fungal infections in renal transplants. Here, we report a case of early-onset candidiasis in a transplanted kidney and present the histological findings, multidisciplinary discussions and treatment given.

Keywords: Infections; Renal system; Renal transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Management of Early Graft Candidiasis in a Kidney Transplant Recipient (A) H&E (magnification ×20)—patchy and dense mixed inflammation involving the interstitium, tubules and surrounding glomeruli including lymphocytes, histiocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils. (B) PAS (magnification ×20)—numerous PAS-positive organisms within tubules, the interstitium and in Bowman’s space. (C) PAS (magnification ×40)—numerous organisms within tubules, the interstitium and in Bowman’s space. The organisms are ovoid, showing mild size variation and are intensely and uniformly PAS-positive. (D) Gram stain (magnification ×20)—the organisms stain positively for gram stain. (E) Grocott (magnification ×20)—the organisms stain positively for Grocott stain.

References

    1. Suthanthiran M, Strom TB. Renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994;331:365–76. 10.1056/NEJM199408113310606 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, et al. . A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1996;50:235–42. 10.1038/ki.1996.307 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. . Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1725–30. 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jardine AG, Gaston RS, Fellstrom BC, et al. . Prevention of cardiovascular disease in adult recipients of kidney transplants. Lancet 2011;378:1419–27. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61334-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ojo AO. Cardiovascular complications after renal transplantation and their prevention. Transplantation 2006;82:603–11. 10.1097/01.tp.0000235527.81917.fe - DOI - PubMed

Publication types