Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36416926
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04285-6
Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: Hartmann's procedure is traditionally performed in emergency situations where single-step procedures with immediate anastomosis may be unsafe. However, it can be associated with significant morbidity and low colostomy reversal rate. Whilst randomised controlled trials and a Cochrane review have reported strong evidence of laparoscopic over open colectomies, no such reviews have been performed for Hartmann's procedure. Hence, this paper aims to summarise the existing evidence to determine the efficacy of laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure over its open counterpart.
Methods: Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 15 November 2020 for keywords relating to 'laparoscopy' and 'Hartmann' using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Odds ratio was estimated for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference was estimated for continuous outcomes.
Results: From the 836 articles yielded from the search strategy, 12 articles were selected for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure (LHP) allows for a shorter length of stay, and a lower risk of overall surgical site infections and superficial surgical site infections. There was no significant difference in other outcomes. Single-arm analysis of LHP also showed an unprecedented high colostomy reversal rate of over 80%.
Conclusion: In clinically suitable patients, laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure has benefits over open Hartmann's procedure. Despite the selection bias of single-arm studies, LHP has reported a high stoma reversal rate of over 80%. Future well-controlled studies should be done to affirm the findings.
Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms; Diverticulitis; Hartmann’s procedure; Laparoscopy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Vermeulen J, Akkersdijk GP, Gosselink MP, Hop WC, Mannaerts GH, van der Harst E, Coene PP, Weidema WF, Lange JF (2007) Outcome after emergency surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis in 200 cases. Dig Surg 24(5):361–366. https://doi.org/10.1159/000107719 - DOI
-
- Facile I, Galli R, Dinter P, Rosenberg R, Von Flüe M, Steinemann DC, Posabella A, Droeser RA (2021) Short- and long-term outcomes for primary anastomosis versus Hartmann’s procedure in Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis: a multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 406(1):121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02015-6 - DOI
-
- Altin O, Kaya S, Sari R, Altuntas YE, Baris B, Kucuk HF (2021) Surgical results of Hartmann procedure in emergency cases with left-sided colorectal cancer. Cir Cir 89(2):150–155. https://doi.org/10.24875/ciru.20000140 - DOI
-
- Hallam S, Mothe BS, Tirumulaju R (2018) Hartmann’s procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100(4):301–307. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0006 - DOI
-
- Njere I, Abdalkoddus M, Bethune R, Mansfield S, Donigiewicz U, Di Mauro D (2021) Quality of life after emergency Hartmann’s procedure: a single centre retrospective study. Clin Surg 6(1)
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
