Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar;12(1):21-33.
doi: 10.1007/s40119-022-00288-0. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

Leadless Cardiac Pacing: New Horizons

Affiliations
Review

Leadless Cardiac Pacing: New Horizons

Katarzyna Malaczynska-Rajpold et al. Cardiol Ther. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Since the introduction of transvenous cardiac pacing leads, pacemaker system design has remained similar for several decades. Progressive miniaturisation of electronic circuitry and batteries has enabled a smaller, single pacing unit comprising the intracardiac electrodes, generator and computer. This review explores the development of leadless pacing, the clinical trials comparing leadless to transvenous pacing in addition to the future developments of multi-chamber leadless pacing.

Keywords: Leadless; Pacemaker; Pacing; Technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Aveir Leadless Pacemaker by Abbott. Modified from Ibrahim et al. [16], with permission
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MICRA transcatheter leadless pacing system by Medtronic. Modified from Ritter et al. [18], with permission
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Atrioventricular synchronous pacing percentage between VVI 50 bpm and VDD mode with Micra AV in 40 patients with complete heart block. b Change in left ventricular outflow tract velocity–time integral (LVOT-VTI) during VDD relative to VVI 50 bpm pacing with a Micra AV device. Modified from Steinwender et al. [41], with permission
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The WiSE CRT system. Reproduced from Wijesuriya et al. [50], with permission

References

    1. Udo EO, Zuithoff NPA, Van Hemel NM, et al. Incidence and predictors of short- and long-term complications in pacemaker therapy: the FOLLOWPACE study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:728–735. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Y, Hou W, Zhou C, et al. Meta-analysis of the incidence of lead dislodgement with conventional and leadless pacemaker systems. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41:1365–1371. doi: 10.1111/pace.13458. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haghjoo M, Nikoo MH, Fazelifar AF, Alizadeh A, Emkanjoo Z, Sadr-Ameli MA. Predictors of venous obstruction following pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a contrast venographic study on 100 patients admitted for generator change, lead revision, or device upgrade. Europace. 2007;9:328–332. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tobin K, Stewart J, Westveer D, Frumin H. Acute complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: their financial implication and relation to volume and operator experience. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:774–776. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00861-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cantillon DJ, Exner DV, Badie N, et al. Complications and health care costs associated with transvenous cardiac pacemakers in a nationwide assessment. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:1296–1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.007. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources