Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;38(5):680-688.
doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02204-x. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator among drug-induced type-1 ECG pattern Brugada syndrome: a propensity score matching analysis from IBRYD study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator among drug-induced type-1 ECG pattern Brugada syndrome: a propensity score matching analysis from IBRYD study

Vincenzo Russo et al. Heart Vessels. 2023 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

No real-world data are available about the complications rate in drug-induced type 1 Brugada Syndrome (BrS) patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Aim of our study is to compare the device-related complications, infections, and inappropriate therapies among drug-induced type 1 BrS patients with transvenous- ICD (TV-ICD) versus subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD). Data for this study were sourced from the IBRYD (Italian BRugada sYnDrome) registry which includes 619 drug-induced type-1 BrS patients followed at 20 Italian tertiary referral hospitals. For the present analysis, we selected 258 consecutive BrS patients implanted with ICD. 198 patients (76.7%) received a TV-ICD, while 60 a S-ICD (23.4%). And were followed-up for a median time of 84.3 [46.5-147] months. ICD inappropriate therapies were experienced by 16 patients (6.2%). 14 patients (7.1%) in the TVICD group and 2 patients (3.3%) in S-ICD group (log-rank P = 0.64). ICD-related complications occurred in 31 patients (12%); 29 (14.6%) in TV-ICD group and 2 (3.3%) in S-ICD group (log-rank P = 0.41). ICD-related infections occurred in 10 patients (3.88%); 9 (4.5%) in TV-ICD group and 1 (1.8%) in S-ICD group (log-rank P = 0.80). After balancing for potential confounders using the propensity score matching technique, no differences were found in terms of clinical outcomes between the two groups. In a real-world setting of drug-induced type-1 BrS patients with ICD, no significant differences in inappropriate ICD therapies, device-related complications, and infections were shown among S-ICD vs TV-ICD. However, a reduction in lead-related complications was observed in the S-ICD group. In conclusion, our evidence suggests that S-ICD is at least non-inferior to TV-ICD in this population and may also reduce the risk of lead-related complications which can expose the patients to the necessity of lead extractions.

Keywords: Brugada syndrome; Drug-induced type 1 Brugada syndrome; ICD-related complication; ICD-related infection; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Inappropriate shock; Subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator; Sudden cardiac death; Transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier curvecomparing survival from inappropriate ICD therapies among S-ICD vs TV-ICD groups in unmatched (A) and matched (B) cohorts
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier curvecomparing survival from ICD-related complications among S-ICD vs TV-ICD groups in unmatched (A) and matched (B) cohorts
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier curvecomparing survival from ICD-related infections among S-ICD vs TV-ICD groups in unmatched (A) and matched (B) cohorts

References

    1. Krahn AD, Behr ER, Hamilton R, Probst V, Laksman Z, Han HC. Brugada syndrome. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8(3):386–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Russo V, Pafundi PC, Caturano A, Dendramis G, Ghidini AO, Santobuono VE, Sciarra L, Notarstefano P, Rucco MA, Attena E, Floris R, Romeo E, Sarubbi B, Nigro G, D'Onofrio A, Calò L, Nesti M. Electrophysiological study prognostic value and long-term outcome in drug-induced type 1 Brugada syndrome: the IBRYD study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(10):1264–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.03.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, Elliott PM, Fitzsimons D, Hatala R, Hindricks G, Kirchhof P, Kjeldsen K, Kuck KH, Hernandez-Madrid A, Nikolaou N, Norekvål TM, Spaulding C, Van Veldhuisen DJ. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the task force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the european society of cardiology (ESC)endorsed by: association for european paediatric and congenital cardiology (AEPC) Europace. 2015;17(11):1601–1687. - PubMed
    1. El-Battrawy I, Roterberg G, Liebe V, Ansari U, Lang S, Zhou X, Borggrefe M, Akin I. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in Brugada syndrome: Long-term follow-up. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42(10):958–965. doi: 10.1002/clc.23247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conte G, Sieira J, Ciconte G, de Asmundis C, Chierchia GB, Baltogiannis G, Di Giovanni G, La Meir M, Wellens F, Czapla J, Wauters K, Levinstein M, Saitoh Y, Irfan G, Julià J, Pappaert G, Brugada P. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in Brugada syndrome: a 20-year single-center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:879–888. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.031. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms