Assessment of Core Surgical Skills Using a Mixed Reality Headset - The MoTOR Study
- PMID: 36418760
- DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01891-3
Assessment of Core Surgical Skills Using a Mixed Reality Headset - The MoTOR Study
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical skill assessment utilises direct observation and feedback by an expert which is potentially subjective, therefore obtaining objective data for hand and eye tracking is essential. Our aim was to evaluate a wearable mixed reality (MR) headset in these domains.
Methods: Participants with differing levels of surgical expertise [novice (N), intermediate (I) & expert (E)] performed 4 simulated surgical tasks; 2 general dexterity (tasks 1&2) and 2 surgical skills (tasks 3&4) wearing the MR headset capturing their hand and eye movements (median & range). Metrics included hand path length and the speed of each index or thumb tip. Gaze data were also captured. Participant demographics, prior expertise and current experience were captured with an electronic survey. Data were analysed with a Shapiro-Wilk test or ANOVA as appropriate. A p-value of < 0.05 was significant.
Results: Thirty-six participants were analysed (N = 18, I = 8, E = 8). Tasks 1&2 revealed 2 speed outcomes (left index and left-hand speed) which were significant. For tasks 3&4, various outcomes were significant: path length for left hand (N:45 cm vs. I:31 cm vs. E:27 cm, p = 0.03) and right hand (N:48 cm vs. I:29 cm vs. E:28 cm, p = 0.01) and total time (N:456s vs. I:292 vs. E: 245, p = 0.0002). With left-hand-tying, average path length (N:61 cm vs. I:39 vs. E:36, p = 0.04), average speed (N:11 cm/s vs. I:23 vs. E:24, p = 0.03), and total time (N:156s vs. I:43 vs. E:37, p = 0.003) were significant. The gaze-tracking was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The MR headset can be utilised as a valid tool for surgical performance assessment. Outcomes including path length and speed can be valuable metrics captured by the MR Headset during the task completion for detecting surgical proficiency.
Keywords: HoloLens®; Motion tracking; mixed reality; operating room; simulation-based education; surgical simulation; wearable technology.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Cameron JL. William Stewart Halsted. Our surgical heritage. Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):445–58. - DOI
-
- Hiemstra E, Kolkman W, Wolterbeek R, Trimbos B, Jansen FW. Value of an objective assessment tool in the operating room. Can J Surg J Can De Chir. 2011;54(2):116–22. - DOI
-
- Hove PDv, Tuijthof GJM, Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Dankelman J. Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. Brit J Surg. 2010;97(7):972–87. - DOI
-
- Vedula SS, Ishii M, Hager GD. Objective Assessment of Surgical Technical Skill and Competency in the Operating Room. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;19(1):301–25. - DOI
-
- Shackelford S, Bowyer M. Modern Metrics for Evaluating Surgical Technical Skills. Curr Surg Reports. 2017;5(10):24. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
