Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 11:4:100088.
doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100088. eCollection 2022.

Do users of long-acting reversible contraceptives receive the same counseling content as other modern method users? A cross-sectional, multi-country analysis of women's experiences with the Method Information Index in six sub-Saharan African countries

Brooke W Bullington  1   2 , Katherine Tumlinson  2   3 , Celia Karp  4 , Leigh Senderowicz  5 , Linnea Zimmerman  4 , Pierre Z Akilimali  6 , Musa Sani Zakirai  7 , Funmilola M OlaOlorun  8 , Simon P S Kibira  9 , Frederick Edward Makumbi  10 , Solomon Shiferaw  11 ; PMA Principal Investigators Group
Affiliations

Do users of long-acting reversible contraceptives receive the same counseling content as other modern method users? A cross-sectional, multi-country analysis of women's experiences with the Method Information Index in six sub-Saharan African countries

Brooke W Bullington et al. Contracept X. .

Abstract

Objective: There has been a growing focus on informed choice in contraceptive research. Because removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including implants and IUDs, requires a trained provider, ensuring informed choice in the adoption of these methods is imperative. We sought to understand whether information received during contraceptive counseling differed among women using LARC and those using other modern methods of contraception.

Study design: We used cross-sectional data from Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda collected in 2019-2020 by the Performance Monitoring for Action project. We included 7969 reproductive-aged women who reported use of modern contraception. Our outcome of interest, information received during contraceptive counseling, was measured using a binary indicator of whether respondents answered "yes" to all 4 questions that make up the Method Information Index Plus (MII+). We used modified Poisson models to estimate the prevalence ratio between method type (LARC vs. other modern methods) and the MII+, controlling for individual- and facility-level covariates.

Results: Reported receipt of the full MII+ during contraceptive counseling ranged from 21% in the DRC to 51% in Kenya. In all countries, a higher proportion of LARC users received the MII+ compared to other modern method users. A greater proportion of LARC users answered "yes" to all questions that make up the MII+ at the time of counseling compared to other modern method users in DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of reporting the full MII+ between users of LARC and other modern methods in Burkina Faso (Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91, 1.48) and Côte d'Ivoire (aPR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.45).

Conclusion: Information received during contraceptive counseling was limited for all modern contraceptive users. LARC users had significantly higher prevalence of receiving the MII+ compared to other modern method users in the DRC, Kenya, and Uganda. Family planning programs should ensure that all women receive complete, unbiased contraceptive counseling.

Implications: Across 6 sub-Saharan African countries, a substantial proportion reproductive-aged women using contraception did not report receiving comprehensive counseling when they received their method. Women using long-acting reversible contraception received more information compared to women using other modern methods in the DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda after controlling for individual- and facility-level factors.

Keywords: Contraception; Family planning; Informed choice; Long-acting reversible contraception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Individual components and full Method Information Index Plus in six sub-Saharan African countries, 2019-2020.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) users and non-LARC users with the Method Information Index Plus in six sub-Saharan African countries, 2019-2020.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann. 1990;21:61. doi: 10.2307/1966669. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Senderowicz L. Contraceptive autonomy: conceptions and measurement of a novel family planning indicator. Stud Fam Plann. 2020;51:161–176. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brandi K., Fuentes L. The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:S873–S877. doi: 10.1016/J.AJOG.2019.11.1271. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dehlendorf C., Reed R., Fox E., Seidman D., Hall C., Steinauer J. Ensuring our research reflects our values: the role of family planning research in advancing reproductive autonomy. Contraception. 2018;98:4. doi: 10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2018.03.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hubacher D., Masaba R., Manduku C.K., Chen M., Veena V. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system: cohort study to assess satisfaction in a postpartum population in Kenya. Contraception. 2015;91:295–300. doi: 10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2015.01.009. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources