Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 7:10:1051119.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051119. eCollection 2022.

A systematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of workplace-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of problematic substance use

Affiliations

A systematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of workplace-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of problematic substance use

Ashleigh K Morse et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Employee alcohol and other drug use can negatively impact the workplace, resulting in absenteeism, reduced productivity, high turnover, and worksite safety issues. As the workplace can influence employee substance use through environmental and cultural factors, it also presents a key opportunity to deliver interventions, particularly to employees who may not otherwise seek help. This is a systematic review of workplace-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of problematic substance use. Five databases were searched for efficacy, effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness studies and reviews published since 2010 that measured use of psychoactive substances (i.e., alcohol, cannabis, hallucinogens, inhalants, opioids, sedatives, hypnotics, anxiolytics, and stimulants) as a primary or secondary outcome, in employees aged over 18. Thirty-nine articles were identified, 28 describing primary research and 11 reviews, most of which focused solely on alcohol use. Heterogeneity between studies with respect to intervention and evaluation design limited the degree to which findings could be synthesized, however, there is some promising evidence for workplace-based universal health promotion interventions, targeted brief interventions, and universal substance use screening. The few studies that examined implementation in the workplace revealed specific barriers including lack of engagement with e-health interventions, heavy use and reluctance to seek help amongst male employees, and confidentiality concerns. Tailoring interventions to each workplace, and ease of implementation and employee engagement emerged as facilitators. Further high-quality research is needed to examine the effectiveness of workplace substance use testing, Employee Assistance Programs, and strategies targeting the use of substances other than alcohol in the workplace.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=227598, PROSPERO [CRD42021227598].

Keywords: alcohol use; drug use; substance use; systematic review; workplace.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith DE, Marzilli L, Davidson LD. Strategies of Drug Prevention in the Workplace: an International Perspective of Drug Testing and Employee Assistance Programs. Textbook Addiction Treatment. New York, NY: Springer; (2021). p. 733-56. 10.1007/978-3-030-36391-8_51 - DOI
    1. Goplerud E, Hodge S, Benham T. A Substance use cost calculator for us employers with an emphasis on prescription pain medication misuse. J Occupat Environ Med. (2017) 59:1063. 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001157 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frone MR. Employee psychoactive substance involvement: historical context, key findings, and future directions. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. (2019) 6:273–97. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015231 - DOI
    1. Roche A, Pidd K, Kostadinov V. Alcohol-and drug-related absenteeism: a costly problem. Aust N Z J Public Health. (2016) 40:236–8. 10.1111/1753-6405.12414 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sorge JT, Young M, Maloney-Hall B, Sherk A, Kent P, Zhao J, et al. . Estimation of the impacts of substance use on workplace productivity: a hybrid human capital and prevalence-based approach applied to Canada. Can J Public Health. (2020) 111:202–11. 10.17269/s41997-019-00271-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types