Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 4;8(4):264-270.
doi: 10.1002/cdt3.35. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Pathophysiology and therapeutic advances in myeloma bone disease

Affiliations
Review

Pathophysiology and therapeutic advances in myeloma bone disease

Fujing Zhang et al. Chronic Dis Transl Med. .

Abstract

Bone disease is the most common complication in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and it may lead to skeletal-related events (SREs) such as bone pain, pathological fractures, and spinal cord compression, which impair a patients' quality of life and survival. The pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease (MBD) involves disruption of bone reconstitution balance including excessive activation of osteoclasts, inhibition of osteoblasts, and participation of osteocytes and bone marrow stromal cells. Various factors, such as the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG), dickkopf-1 (DKK-1), sclerostin, and activin-A, are involved in the development of MBD. Bisphosphonates and the anti-RANKL antibody denosumab are currently the main treatment options for MBD, delaying the onset of SREs. Denosumab is preferred in patients with MM and renal dysfunction. Although effective drugs have been approved, antimyeloma therapy is the most important method for controlling bone disease.

Keywords: bone disease; multiple myeloma; therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Professor Junling Zhuang is a member of Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine editorial board and is not involved in the peer review process of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pathophysiology and main treatment options for myeloma bone disease. BMSCs, bone marrow stromal cells; DKK‐1, Dickkpof‐1; HSPG, heparan sulfate proteoglycan; OPG, osteoprotegerin; RANK, receptor activation of nuclear factor B (NF‐κB); RANKL, receptor activation of nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) ligand.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coleman RE. Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer. 1997;80:1588‐1594. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971015)80:8+<1588::aid-cncr9>3.3.co;2-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terpos E, Morgan G, Dimopoulos MA, et al. International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for the treatment of multiple myeloma‐related bone disease. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2347‐2357. 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.7901 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:21‐33. 10.4065/78.1.21 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terpos E, Berenson J, Cook RJ, Lipton A, Coleman RE. Prognostic variables for survival and skeletal complications in patients with multiple myeloma osteolytic bone disease. Leukemia. 2010;24:1043‐1049. 10.1038/leu.2010.62 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saad F, Lipton A, Cook R, Chen Y‐M, Smith M, Coleman R. Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer. 2007;110:1860‐1867. 10.1002/cncr.22991 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources