The power of weak signals: how systematic reviews direct researchers away from potentially biased primary studies
- PMID: 36421032
- PMCID: PMC9686362
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ED000160
The power of weak signals: how systematic reviews direct researchers away from potentially biased primary studies
Keywords: Methodology.
References
-
- Bunn F, Trivedi D, Alderson P, Hamilton L, Martin A, Iliffe S. The impact of Cochrane systematic reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research. Systematic Reviews 2014;3:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-125 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Parker L, Boughton S, Lawrence R, Bero L. Experts identified warning signs of fraudulent research: a qualitative study to inform a screening tool. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2022;51:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.006 - PubMed
-
- Lu SF, Jin GZ, Uzzi B, Jones B. The retraction penalty: evidence from the Web of Science. Scientific Reports 2013;3:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03146 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Salandra R, Criscuolo P, Salter A. Directing scientists away from potentially biased publications: the role of systematic reviews in health care. Research Policy 2021;50:104130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104130
-
- Salandra R. Knowledge dissemination in clinical trials: exploring influences of institutional support and type of innovation on selective reporting. Research Policy 2018;47:1215–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.005
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources