Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;65(3):233-241.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

Predictors of Documented Goals-of-Care Discussion for Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Illness

Affiliations

Predictors of Documented Goals-of-Care Discussion for Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Illness

Alison M Uyeda et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Context: Goals-of-care discussions are important for patient-centered care among hospitalized patients with serious illness. However, there are little data on the occurrence, predictors, and timing of these discussions.

Objectives: To examine the occurrence, predictors, and timing of electronic health record (EHR)-documented goals-of-care discussions for hospitalized patients.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used natural language processing (NLP) to examine EHR-documented goals-of-care discussions for adults with chronic life-limiting illness or age ≥80 hospitalized 2015-2019. The primary outcome was NLP-identified documentation of a goals-of-care discussion during the index hospitalization. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate associations with baseline characteristics.

Results: Of 16,262 consecutive, eligible patients without missing data, 5,918 (36.4%) had a documented goals-of-care discussion during hospitalization; approximately 57% of these discussions occurred within 24 hours of admission. In multivariable analysis, documented goals-of-care discussions were more common for women (OR=1.26, 95%CI 1.18-1.36), older patients (OR=1.04 per year, 95%CI 1.03-1.04), and patients with more comorbidities (OR=1.11 per Deyo-Charlson point, 95%CI 1.10-1.13), cancer (OR=1.88, 95%CI 1.72-2.06), dementia (OR=2.60, 95%CI 2.29-2.94), higher acute illness severity (OR=1.12 per National Early Warning Score point, 95%CI 1.11-1.14), or prior advance care planning documents (OR=1.18, 95%CI 1.08-1.30). Documentation of these discussions was less common for racially or ethnically minoritized patients (OR=0.823, 95%CI 0.75-0.90).

Conclusion: Among hospitalized patients with serious illness, documented goals-of-care discussions identified by NLP were more common among patients with older age and increased burden of acute or chronic illness, and less common among racially or ethnically minoritized patients. This suggests important disparities in goals-of-care discussions.

Keywords: Ethnicity; Goals-of-care discussions; Palliative care; Race; Serious illness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Timing of Goals-of-Care Discussions during Index Hospitalizationa
a Graph shows for each day, the volume of discussions that day as a percentage of discussions that occurred during the first 21 days of hospitalization. Discussions occurring during this 3-week period represented 97.3% of all discussions that occurred the hospitalization. An additional 1.8% of the discussions had occurred by Day 35, with 0.8% occurring after day 35 – the latest taking place on Day 216. Of the 5,918 patients who had goals-of-care discussions during the index hospitalization, 3,390 (57.3%) had their initial discussion on Day 1 (i.e., fewer than 24 hours after admission). IQR = 3.

References

    1. Sanders JJ, Curtis JR, Tulsky JA. Achieving Goal-Concordant Care: A Conceptual Model and Approach to Measuring Serious Illness Communication and Its Impact. J Palliat Med. Mar 2018;21(S2):S17–S27. doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0459 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sudore RL, Heyland DK, Lum HD, et al. Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2018/02/01/ 2018;55(2):245–255.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Secunda K, Wirpsa MJ, Neely KJ, et al. Use and Meaning of “Goals of Care” in the Healthcare Literature: a Systematic Review and Qualitative Discourse Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. May 2020;35(5):1559–1566. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05446-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edmonds KP, Ajayi TA. Do We Know What We Mean? An Examination of the Use of the Phrase “Goals of Care” in the Literature. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2019/12/01 2019;22(12):1546–1552. doi:10.1089/jpm.2019.0059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haberle TH, Shinkunas LA, Erekson ZD, Kaldjian LC. Goals of Care among Hospitalized Patients: A Validation Study. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®. 2011/08/01 2010;28(5):335–341. doi:10.1177/1049909110388505 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types