Saliva microRNA signature to diagnose endometriosis: A cost-effectiveness evaluation of the Endotest®
- PMID: 36424910
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17348
Saliva microRNA signature to diagnose endometriosis: A cost-effectiveness evaluation of the Endotest®
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a saliva diagnostic test (Endotest®) for endometriosis compared with the conventional algorithm.
Design: A cost-effectiveness analysis with a decision-tree model based on literature data.
Setting: France.
Population: Women with chronic pelvic pain.
Methods: Strategy I is the French algorithm, representing the comparator. For strategy II, all patients have an Endotest®. For strategy III, patients undergo ultrasonography to detect endometrioma and patients with no endometrioma detected have an Endotest®. For strategy IV, patients with no endometrioma detected on ultrasonography undergo pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect endometrioma and/or deep endometriosis. An Endotest® is then performed for patients with a negative result on MRI.
Main outcomes measures: Costs and accuracy rates and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Three analyses were performed with an Endotest® priced at €500, €750, and €1000. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted with Monte Carlo simulations.
Results: With an Endotest® priced at €750, the cost per correctly diagnosed case was €1542, €990, €919 and €1000, respectively, for strategies I, II, III and IV. Strategy I was dominated by all other strategies. Strategies IV, III and II were, respectively, preferred for a willingness-to-pay threshold below €473, between €473 and €4670, and beyond €4670 per correctly diagnosed case. At a price of €500 per Endotest®, strategy I was dominated by all other strategies. At €1000, the ICERs of strategies II and III were €724 and €387 per correctly diagnosed case, respectively, compared with strategy I.
Conclusion: The present study demonstrates the value of the Endotest® from an economic perspective.
Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis; diagnosis; endometriosis; health economics; saliva miRNA signature.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Members of the Endometriosis Guideline Core Group, Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009.
-
- Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004;364(9447):1789-99.
-
- Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Pouly JL, Rabischong B, Botchorishvili R, Mage G. Relationship between delay of surgical diagnosis and severity of disease in patients with symptomatic deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):1314-6; discussion 1317.
-
- Greene R, Stratton P, Cleary SD, Ballweg ML, Sinaii N. Diagnostic experience among 4,334 women reporting surgically diagnosed endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(1):32-9.
-
- Bourdel N, Chauvet P, Canis M. Diagnostic strategies for endometriosis: CNGOF-HAS endometriosis guidelines. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46(3):209-13.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical