Intrinsic subtypes and therapeutic decision-making in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with visceral crisis: A case report
- PMID: 36425558
- PMCID: PMC9679790
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1009352
Intrinsic subtypes and therapeutic decision-making in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with visceral crisis: A case report
Abstract
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKi), namely, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, combined with either an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant are the standard first/second line for hormone receptor-positive(HR+)/HER2-negative(neg) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the choice of one specific CDKi is arbitrary and based on the physician's experience with the drug, toxicity profile, and patient's preferences, whereas biomarkers for optimal patient selection have not been established so far. Moreover, upfront chemotherapy is still recommended in case of clinical presentation with visceral crisis, despite no evidence of superior benefit for chemotherapy regimens against CDKi-based regimens. Recent correlative biomarker analyses from pivotal trials of palbociclib and ribociclib showed that HR+/HER2-neg MBC might respond differently according to the molecular intrinsic subtype, with Luminal A and B tumors being sensitive to both CDKi, Basal-like being insensitive to endocrine therapy, irrespective of CDKi, and HER2-enriched tumors showing a benefit only with ribociclib-based therapy.
Clinical case: We hereby present a paradigmatic clinical case of a woman affected by a relapsed HR+/HER2-neg MBC with bone and nodal lesions, presenting with a visceral crisis in the form of lymphangitis carcinomatosis and diagnosed with a molecularly HER2-enriched tumor, successfully treated with upfront ribociclib + fulvestrant. The patient experienced a complete symptomatic and radiologic remission of the lymphangitis with a partial response as best response, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The progression-free survival (PFS) was of 20 months, in line with the median PFS observed in the ribociclib + fulvestrant pivotal trial, where, however, patients with visceral crisis had been excluded.
Conclusions: This clinical case confirms in the real-world setting that non-luminal subtypes can be found in HR+/HER2-neg disease and may have potential therapeutic implications in the metastatic setting. It also questions the recommendation of upfront chemotherapy in the case of a visceral crisis in the era of CDKi-based regimens. These issues merit further evaluation in prospective and larger studies.
Keywords: CDK4/6-inhibitors; HER2-enriched; HER2-negative; hormone receptor (HR); intrinsic subtype; metastatic breast cancer; ribociclib; visceral crisis.
Copyright © 2022 Schettini, Seguí, Conte, Sanfeliu, Gonzalez-Farre, Jares, Vidal-Sicart, Ganau, Cebrecos, Brasó-Maristany, Muñoz, Prat and Vidal.
Conflict of interest statement
AP declares no competing non-financial interests but reports advisory and consulting fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Puma, Oncolytics Biotech, MSD, Guardant Health, Peptomyc, and Lilly; lecture fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, NanoString Technologies, and Daiichi Sankyo; and institutional financial interests from Boehringer, Novartis, Roche, NanoString, Sysmex Europa GmbH, Medica Scientia Innovation Research, SL, Celgene, Astellas, and Pfizer and shares ownership and a leadership role in Reveal Genomics, SL. MV declares consulting fees e.g., advisory boards from Roche, Novartis, and Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Novartis, and Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca; and honoraria for presentations by Roche, Novartis, and Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca FS declares honoraria for presentations/educational materials paid by Novartis.. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network . NCCN guidelines for breast cancer, vers.4 (2022). Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf (Accessed June 28, 2022).
-
- Burstein HJ, Somerfield MR, Barton DL, Dorris A, Fallowfield LJ, Jain D, et al. . Endocrine treatment and targeted therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol (2021) 39:3959–77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01392 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gao JJ, Cheng J, Bloomquist E, Sanchez J, Wedam SB, Singh H, et al. . CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a US food and drug administration pooled analysis. Lancet Oncol (2020) 21:250–60. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30804-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schettini F, Giudici F, Giuliano M, Cristofanilli M, Arpino G, Del Mastro L, et al. . Overall survival of CDK4/6-inhibitors-based treatments in clinically relevant subgroups of metastatic breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst (2020) 112:1089–97. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa071 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
