Olfactory perception of 5α-androst-16-en-3-one: Data obtained in the residents of central Russia
- PMID: 36426003
- PMCID: PMC9679716
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108704
Olfactory perception of 5α-androst-16-en-3-one: Data obtained in the residents of central Russia
Abstract
This dataset describes olfactory perception of androstenone (5α-androst-16-en-3-one) in residents of central Russia (n=807, 9-84 years old). Based on previous studies, 3.13 × 10-3% androstenone was utilized for sensory testing. A modified two-alternative choice task with "no-difference" options was applied as an odor discrimination procedure. The participants rated the perceived odor intensity and pleasantness on 3-point categorical scales. The subsequent task was free odor identification. We used a survey to determine characteristics of our study population such as age, sex, ethnicity, olfactory abilities, smoking habits, respiratory tract diseases, perfume use, blood group. To examine sex differences in characteristics of participants, as well as in their perception of androstenone, we have applied one-way ANOVA for age variable and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. The dataset will be useful for assessing the impact of the aforementioned factors on the perception of volatile steroids. A wide range of researchers studying verbal descriptors of specific odors and cross-cultural differences in olfactory perception may reuse this dataset. Primarily, this dataset may benefit meat industry, as androstenone, which is perceived as an unpleasant odor by about a quarter of the population, significantly contributes to pork flavor.
Keywords: Hedonic response; Humans; Odor descriptors; Smell; Specific anosmia; Volatile steroids.
© 2022 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Pleasantness of the odor of androstenone as a function of sexual intercourse experience in women and men.Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Dec;41(6):1403-8. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9804-7. Epub 2011 Jul 2. Arch Sex Behav. 2012. PMID: 21725680
-
Olfactory event-related potentials reflect individual differences in odor valence perception.Chem Senses. 2006 Oct;31(8):705-11. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjl012. Epub 2006 Jul 14. Chem Senses. 2006. PMID: 16844768
-
Individual differences in the perceived intensity and quality of specific odors following self- and cross-adaptation.Chem Senses. 1994 Jun;19(3):197-208. doi: 10.1093/chemse/19.3.197. Chem Senses. 1994. PMID: 8055270
-
Dataset on assessing olfactory function in the residents of Central Russia using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.Data Brief. 2023 Dec 2;52:109901. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109901. eCollection 2024 Feb. Data Brief. 2023. PMID: 38093852 Free PMC article.
-
The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Feb;51(2):70-6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.767908. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013. PMID: 23387344 Review.
Cited by
-
Autonomic Responses Associated with Olfactory Preferences of Fragrance Consumers: Skin Conductance, Respiration, and Heart Rate.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;24(17):5604. doi: 10.3390/s24175604. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39275516 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation method of Driver's olfactory preferences: a machine learning model based on multimodal physiological signals.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 18;12:1433861. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1433861. eCollection 2024. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39744593 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gilbert A.N., Wysocki C.J. The smell survey results. National Geographic. 1987;172:514–525.
-
- Labows J.N., Wysocki C.J. Individual differences in odor perception. Perfumer & Flavourist. 1984;9:21–26. https://img.perfumerflavorist.com/files/base/allured/all/document/2016/0... (accessed 13 October 2022)
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials