Predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term
- PMID: 36426906
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14591
Predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term
Abstract
Objective: To determine predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term.
Method: Prospective observational study of nulliparous women with singleton term fetuses in vertex presentation, intact membranes, and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6) who underwent cervical ripening with a cervical-ripening balloon (CRB; n = 47) or dinoprostone vaginal insert (PG; n = 28). The authors analyzed Bishop score criteria (dilatation, effacement, fetal station, consistency, position) before and after device removal. Primary outcome was favorable cervix (Bishop score ≥ 6) after device removal. Secondary outcomes were vaginal delivery, modification of Bishop score criteria, and perinatal morbidity.
Results: Rates of favorable cervix after cervical ripening were similar between groups (66.7% with CRB vs. 59.3% with PG; P = 0.526). Vaginal delivery (76.6% vs. 78.6%; P = 0.843) and perinatal morbidity did not differ between groups. CRB appeared to be more effective than PG in increasing consistency (+0.7 ± 0.2 vs. +0.3 ± 0.2; P = 0.001) and dilatation of the cervix (+1.3 ± 0.3 vs. +0.9 ± 0.3; P = 0.005). No Bishop score criterion was found as a significant predictor for vaginal delivery.
Conclusion: CRB seems to be more effective than PG in increasing the consistency and dilatation of the cervix. Efficacy of CRB and PG for vaginal delivery was similar.
Keywords: bishop score; cervical ripening; cervical-ripening balloon; dinoprostone; induction of labor; vaginal delivery.
© 2022 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Department of Reproductive Health and Research. [WHO website]. 2011. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_h.... Accessed January 11, 2022.
-
- Blondel B, Coulm B, Bonnet C, Goffinet F, Le Ray C. National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;2017(46):701-713.
-
- Blanc-Petitjean P, Salomé M, Dupont C, et al. Overview of induction of labor practices in France. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019;47:555-561.
-
- Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Benthem M, et al. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378:2095-2103.
-
- Diguisto C, Le Gouge A, Arthuis C, et al. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: the MAGPOP randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2021;18:e1003448.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources