Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 16;19(22):15137.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215137.

A Comparison of 5v5 and 3x3 Men's Basketball Regarding Shot Selection and Efficiency

Affiliations

A Comparison of 5v5 and 3x3 Men's Basketball Regarding Shot Selection and Efficiency

Zoltan Boros et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Both in 5v5 and 3x3 basketball, the goal of the players is to score more points than the opponent. However, the differences in rules between two basketball disciplines can affect thinking, behaviour, and decisions of the players. A core difference between two disciplines is the value of the shots. In 5v5, long-range shots are worth three points and close-range two, while in 3x3, their values are two and one points, respectively. As the value ratio of the close and long-range shots is greater in 3x3, we assume that players make different decisions about their shot selection in 3x3 than in 5v5, which can affect offensive efficiency.

Methods: We analysed game statistics of the 2019 men's 5v5 and 3x3 Basketball World Cups. Besides regular statistical indicators, we applied relative offensive rating to be able to compare the two disciplines.

Results: The analysis of relative offensive rating showed that offences are more effective in 5v5 than in 3x3. We also found significant difference in shot selection and efficiency. In 3x3, there is a higher proportion of the shots than in 5v5, but long-range shots are more successful in 5v5.

Conclusions: For rule differences that affect player's shot selection and affect offensive efficiency, their decisions are characterized by ecological dynamics and naturalistic decision-making.

Keywords: 3x3; basketball; behaviour; decision-making; offensive efficiency; offensive rating; shot selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The 5v5 (grey) and 3x3 (black) half-court lines and shooting range of point values for each discipline—adapted from the official FIBA website [7].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative offensive rating regarding basketball discipline.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Shooting percentage regarding basketball discipline (A), range of shot (B), and their interaction (C).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Ratios of close–mid- and long-range-shot attempts to all field-goal attempts overall (A) and regarding discipline (B).

References

    1. Sampaio J., Abrantes C., Leite N. Power, heart rate and perceived exertion responses to 3x3 and 4 × 4 basketball small-sided games. Rev. De Psicol. Del Deporte. 2009;18:463–467.
    1. Sampaio J., Gonçalves B., Rentero L., Abrantes C., Leite N. Exploring how basketball players’ tactical performances can be affected by activity workload. Sci. Sport. 2013;29:e23–e30. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2013.05.004. - DOI
    1. Erculj F., Vidic M., Leskosek B. Shooting efficiency and structure of shooting in 3x3 basketball compared to 5v5 basketball. Int. J. Sport Sci. Coach. 2020;15:91–98. doi: 10.1177/1747954119887722. - DOI
    1. Ferioli D., Rampinini E., Conte D., Rucco D., Romagnoli M., Scanlan A. Physical demands during 3×3 international male and female basketball games are partially impacted by competition phase but not game outcome. Biol. Sport. 2022;40:377–387. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.116012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herrán T., Usabiaga O., Castellano J. Comparación del perfil físico entre 3x3 y 5 × 5 en baloncesto formative, Physical Profile Comparison Between 3×3 and 5×5 Basketball Training. Int. J. Med. Sci. Phys. Act. Sport. 2017;17:435–447.