Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 18;19(22):15271.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215271.

ASPHALT II: Study Protocol for a Multi-Method Evaluation of a Comprehensive Peer-Led Youth Community Sport Programme Implemented in Low Resource Neighbourhoods

Julie Hellesøe Christensen  1 , Cecilie Karen Ljungmann  1 , Charlotte Skau Pawlowski  2 , Helene Rald Johnsen  1 , Nikoline Olsen  3 , Mathilde Hulgård  3 , Adrian Bauman  1   4 , Charlotte Demant Klinker  1
Affiliations

ASPHALT II: Study Protocol for a Multi-Method Evaluation of a Comprehensive Peer-Led Youth Community Sport Programme Implemented in Low Resource Neighbourhoods

Julie Hellesøe Christensen et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

To reduce inequalities in children's sport participation, studies are needed to explore ways in which children from low resource neighbourhoods can be engaged and retained in sport. GAME Community is a peer-led community sport programme which aims to promote physical activity through participation in inclusive street sports activities targeting 8-15-year-old children living in low resource neighbourhoods. The GAME Community intervention is implemented by the non-profit street sport organisation GAME. Five components support the implementation of GAME Community: (1) training of peer leaders; (2) a focus on inclusion of inactive girls; (3) parental involvement; (4) community engagement; (5) strengthened organisational support to peer leaders. In the ASPHALT II study, we aim to evaluate GAME Community and hence contribute to understanding how children growing up in low resource neighbourhoods can be engaged and retained in physical activity through participation in peer-led, community-based sport and to generate new understandings on the scale up of community interventions. The primary objective of the evaluation is to investigate the implementation of GAME Community and the programme's reach, and to establish the functioning and mechanisms of the programme. The secondary objective is to establish the health enhancing potential of the programme. The evaluation of GAME Community involves three linked but independent studies that investigate (1) the functioning (i.e., mechanisms and processes), (2) reach, and (3) outcomes. The functioning of the five intervention components is investigated using qualitative methodologies. Programme reach will be investigated based on participant registrations. Systematic observations using a novel combination of validated tools will provide information on outcomes (physical activity level and social behaviour) during GAME Community activities. Investigating functioning, reach, and outcomes of the GAME Community intervention by using multiple methods is a strength, as different data complement and inform each other. This study will provide in-depth insights into if and how children living in low resource neighbourhoods can be engaged and retained in physical activity through participation in peer-led, community-based sport. Contributions of this evaluation include new understanding of the mechanisms and scalability of a community-based street sport intervention.

Keywords: low resource neighborhoods; peer education; physical activity; prospective study; street sport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Logic model for the GAME Community Intervention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Janssen I., LeBlanc A.G. Systematic Review of the Health Benefits of Physical Activity and Fitness in School-Aged Children and Youth. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-40. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen L.B., Hasselstrøm H., Grønfeldt V., Hansen S.E., Karsten F. The Relationship between Physical Fitness and Clustered Risk, and Tracking of Clustered Risk from Adolescence to Young Adulthood: Eight Years Follow-up in the Danish Youth and Sport Study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2004;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-1-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Telama R. Tracking of Physical Activity from Childhood to Adulthood: A Review. Obes. Facts. 2009;2:187–195. doi: 10.1159/000222244. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guthold R., Stevens G.A., Riley L.M., Bull F.C. Global Trends in Insufficient Physical Activity among Adolescents: A Pooled Analysis of 298 Population-Based Surveys with 1.6 Million Participants. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health. 2020;4:23–35. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Sluijs E.M.F., Ekelund U., Crochemore-Silva I., Guthold R., Ha A., Lubans D., Oyeyemi A.L., Ding D., Katzmarzyk P.T. Physical Activity Behaviours in Adolescence: Current Evidence and Opportunities for Intervention. Lancet. 2021;398:429–442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01259-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types