Active School-Based Interventions to Interrupt Prolonged Sitting Improve Daily Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 36430128
- PMCID: PMC9693257
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192215409
Active School-Based Interventions to Interrupt Prolonged Sitting Improve Daily Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Sedentary behavior (SB) is a negative routine for health, especially during advancing age. Promoting an active lifestyle and reducing SB is a global endeavor. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of active school-based programs to interrupt prolonged sitting for daily physical activity (PA) and daily SB in children and adolescents.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Clinical trials analyzing the effect of interrupting prolonged sitting with active breaks and classroom-based PA were included. Studies that implemented PA in class without interrupting prolonged sitting or those that implemented multimodal interventions were excluded. A systematic search was conducted in 6 databases: Medline, WOS, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and EMBASE. Primary outcomes were daily PA and daily SB, while moderate-to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was considered a secondary outcome.
Results: Six studies were included, with a total of 976 participants between 6-14 years. The interventions were heterogeneous in duration of the sitting time interruption (5-30 min), frequency (1-3 times per-day up to three times per-week) and total duration (five days to three years). 50% of the studies scored "high risk" of bias. Three meta-analyses were performed for daily PA, MVPA and SB, showing a significant improvement in the daily PA and MVPA.
Conclusions: School-based programs aimed to interrupt prolonged sitting could be a good strategy to improve daily PA and MVPA levels. (Registration number: CRD42022358933).
Keywords: adolescents; children; daily physical activity; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; school; sedentary behavior; sitting interruption.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Tremblay M.S., Aubert S., Barnes J.D., Saunders T.J., Carson V., Latimer-Cheung A.E., Chastin S.F.M., Altenburg T.M., Chinapaw M.J.M., Aminian S., et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN)-Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017;14:75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chaput J.P., Willumsen J., Bull F., Chou R., Ekelund U., Firth J., Jago R., Ortega F.B., Katzmarzyk P.T. 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5–17 years: Summary of the evidence. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020;17:141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Tremblay M.S., Leblanc A.G., Carson V., Choquette L., Connor Gorber S., Dillman C., Duggan M., Gordon M.J., Hicks A., Janssen I., et al. Canadian Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for the Early Years (aged 0–4 years) Metab Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2012;37:370–391. doi: 10.1139/h2012-019. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical