Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 21;11(22):6870.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11226870.

Risk Factors and Corresponding Management for Suture Anchor Pullout during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Affiliations
Review

Risk Factors and Corresponding Management for Suture Anchor Pullout during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Xiangwei Li et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the aging of the population, the incidence of rotator cuff tears is growing. For rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic suture-anchor repair has gradually replaced open transosseous repair, so suture anchors are now considered increasingly important in rotator cuff tear reconstruction. There are some but limited studies of suture anchor pullout after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, there is no body of knowledge in this area, which makes it difficult for clinicians to predict the risk of anchor pullout comprehensively and manage it accordingly.

Methods: The literature search included rotator cuff repair as well as anchor pullout strength. A review of the literature was performed including all articles published in PubMed until September 2021. Articles of all in vitro biomechanical and clinical trial levels in English were included. After assessing all abstracts (n = 275), the full text and the bibliographies of the relevant articles were analyzed for the questions posed (n = 80). Articles including outcomes without the area of interest were excluded (n = 22). The final literature research revealed 58 relevant articles. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to bring together the findings from studies included in this review.

Result: Based on the presented studies, the overall incidence of anchor pullout is not low, and the incidence of intraoperative anchor pullout is slightly higher than in the early postoperative period. The risk factors for anchor pullout are mainly related to bone quality, insertion depth, insertion angle, size of rotator cuff tear, preoperative corticosteroid injections, anchor design, the materials used to produce anchors, etc. In response to the above issues, we have introduced and evaluated management techniques. They include changing the implant site of anchors, cement augmentation for suture anchors, increasing the number of suture limbs, using all-suture anchors, using an arthroscopic transosseous knotless anchor, the Buddy anchor technique, Steinmann pin anchoring, and transosseous suture repair technology.

Discussion: However, not many of the management techniques have been widely used in clinical practice. Most of them come from in vitro biomechanical studies, so in vivo randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to see if they can help patients in the long run.

Keywords: anchor pullout; bone quality; osteopenia; osteoporosis; pullout strength; rotator cuff repair; rotator cuff tear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Intraoperative metallic suture anchor pullout; (b) intraoperative polyetheretherketone suture anchor pullout.

References

    1. Colvin A.C., Egorova N., Harrison A.K., Moskowitz A., Flatow E.L. National Trends in Rotator Cuff Repair. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2012;94:227–233. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00739. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harryman D.T., 2nd, Hettrich C.M., Smith K.L., Campbell B., Sidles J.A., Matsen F.A., 3rd A prospective multipractice investigation of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears: The importance of comorbidities, practice, and other covariables on self-assessed shoulder function and health status. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2003;85:690–696. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200304000-00016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barber F.A., Herbert M.A. Cyclic Loading Biomechanical Analysis of the Pullout Strengths of Rotator Cuff and Glenoid Anchors: 2013 Update. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 2013;29:832–844. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tingart M.J., Apreleva M., Lehtinen J., Zurakowski D., Warner J.J. Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: Which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality? Am. J. Sports Med. 2004;32:1466–1473. doi: 10.1177/0363546503262644. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirchhoff C., Braunstein V., Milz S., Sprecher C.M., Fischer F., Tami A., Ahrens P., Imhoff A.B., Hinterwimmer S. Assessment of bone quality within the tuberosities of the osteoporotic humeral head: Relevance for anchor positioning in rotator cuff repair. Am. J. Sports Med. 2010;38:564–569. doi: 10.1177/0363546509354989. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources