Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 8;15(22):7895.
doi: 10.3390/ma15227895.

Effect of Cu Addition on the Corrosion and Antifouling Properties of PEO Coated Zinc-Aluminized Steel

Affiliations

Effect of Cu Addition on the Corrosion and Antifouling Properties of PEO Coated Zinc-Aluminized Steel

Luca Pezzato et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

In the present work, Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) coatings were produced on zinc-aluminized carbon steels (Galvalume commercial treatment). In addition, copper particles of various sizes were introduced into the coating in order to produce samples with antifouling properties. The particles were successfully embedded into the coating. A higher number of embedded particles was observed when these are in sub-micrometric size and obtained in pulsed current. The presence of particles produces significant antifouling properties on the sample's surfaces during the first 20 days of immersion. The presence of the particles reduces the corrosion resistance in comparison to the samples PEO coated without the particles; however, the corrosion resistance remain higher than the one of the untreated sample.

Keywords: Galvalume; Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation; anti-corrosion coatings; antifouling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SEM image of the “large” copper particles (A) and of the “small” copper particles (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stereo microscope images of the surfaces of PEO coatings obtained working at 0.5 A/cm2 in DC mode without particles (A), with large particles (B) and with small particles (C) and working at 1 A/cm2 in UPC without particles (D), with large particles (E) and with small particles (F).
Figure 3
Figure 3
SEM images of the surfaces of PEO coatings obtained working at 0.5 A/cm2 in DC mode without particles (A), with large particles (B) and with small particles (C), and working at 1 A/cm2 in UPC without particles (D), with large particles (E) and with small particles (F).
Figure 4
Figure 4
SEM images of the cross section of PEO coatings obtained working at 0.5 A/cm2 in DC mode without particles (A), with large particles (B) and with small particles (C), and working at 1 A/cm2 in UPC without particles (D), with large particles (E) and with small particles (F).
Figure 5
Figure 5
EDS elemental maps of the samples obtained working at 1 A/cm2 in UPC with large particles (A) and with small particles (B).
Figure 6
Figure 6
EDS elemental line analysis of the sample obtained working at 1 A/cm2 in UPC with small particles.
Figure 7
Figure 7
X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples obtained working at 0.5 A/cm2 in DC mode without particles (A) and with large particles (B) and working at 1 A/cm2 in UPC without particles (C), with large particles (D) and with small particles (E). Sample obtained at 0.5 A/cm2 in DC with small particles not reported due to failure of the coating.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Results of potentiodynamic polarization tests (PDP) performed on the samples produced without particles and with “large” particles (A) and of the samples produced with “small” and “large” particles (B). Test electrolyte: 0.1 M Na2SO4 and 0.05 M NaCl.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Results of the EIS tests in term of Nyquist plot. In the high left, the zone at the high frequencies can be observed in more detail. Test electrolyte: 0.1 M Na2SO4 and 0.05 M NaCl.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Equivalent circuit employed to fit the experimental data coming from EIS test.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Visual observation (on the upper part) and stereo-microscope observation (on the bottom part) of the untreated samples after 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 days of immersion in circulating seawater at the Hydrobiological Station Umberto D’Ancona.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Visual observation (on the upper part) and stereo-microscope observation (on the bottom part) of the PEO treated samples (1A UP No part) samples after 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 days of immersion in circulating seawater at the Umberto D’Ancona Hydrobiological Station.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Visual observation (on the upper part) and stereo-microscope observation (on the bottom part) of the PEO treated samples with copper particles (1A UP small part) samples after 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 days of immersion in circulating seawater at the Umberto D’Ancona hydrobiological station.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Scanning electron micrographs showing some diatoms found in the samples. (A) Amphora sp., bar = 10 µm; (B) Navicula sp., bar = 10 µm; (C) Navicula sp., bar = 5 µm; (D) Licmophora sp., bar = 5 µm.

References

    1. Wang Y.L., Wang M., Zhou M., Li B.J., Amoako G., Jiang Z.H. Microstructure characterisation of alumina coating on steel by PEO. Surf. Eng. 2013;29:271–275. doi: 10.1179/1743294412Y.0000000084. - DOI
    1. Attarzadeh N., Molaei M., Babaei K., Fattah-alhosseini A. New Promising Ceramic Coatings for Corrosion and Wear Protection of Steels: A Review. Surf. Interfaces. 2021;23:100997. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.100997. - DOI
    1. Yerokhin A.L., Snizhko L.O., Gurevina N.L., Leyland A., Pilkington A., Matthews A. Spatial characteristics of discharge phenomena in plasma electrolytic oxidation of aluminium alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2004;177–178:779–783. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.06.020. - DOI
    1. Hryniewicz T. Plasma electrolytic oxidation of metals and alloys. Metals. 2018;8:1058. doi: 10.3390/met8121058. - DOI
    1. Egorkin V.S., Gnedenkov S.V., Sinebryukhov S.L., Vyaliy I.E., Gnedenkov A.S., Chizhikov R.G. Increasing thickness and protective properties of PEO-coatings on aluminum alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018;334:29–42. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.11.025. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources