Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 16;27(22):7910.
doi: 10.3390/molecules27227910.

Effect of Hop Varieties and Forms in the Hopping Process on Non-Alcoholic Beer Quality

Affiliations

Effect of Hop Varieties and Forms in the Hopping Process on Non-Alcoholic Beer Quality

Kinga Adamenko et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine how the hopping technique affects the quality of non-alcoholic beer (NAB). A series of NABs were brewed and tested for basic physicochemical characteristics, profiles of selected volatile compounds, and microbial contamination. The brewing process yielded 13 experimental groups of beers, all of which had an ethanol content of <0.5%v/v. Among the batches brewed with ‘Marynka’ hops, the pellet form was found to provide the highest concentrations of hop-derived volatile compounds, whereas in the ‘Magnum’ groups, the extracts and whole hops proved superior. Humulene and caryophyllene were the primary volatiles in terms of quantity. All the brews were contamination-free—no microbes other than yeast cells were detected. Their microbiological purity was also supported by an assay of beer-defect indicators (volatile compounds), which only showed low levels of acetaldehyde, 1-propanol, 2-methylbutanol, and 3-methylbutanol. The hopping technique deployed was found not to affect the physicochemical parameters of NABs, but did have a significant impact on their volatile compound profile.

Keywords: beer chemistry; brewing; fermentation technology; fermented beverages; hop; non-alcoholic beer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example view of microbial cultivation in non-alcoholic beer. The labels correspond to the following batches: W1-2 is B0; W1-15 is ME40; W1-11 is AC40, W1-4 is AE60.

Similar articles

References

    1. Tembrock L.R., McAleer J.M., Gilligan T.M. A revision of native North American Humulus (Cannabaceae) J. Bot. Res. Inst. Tex. 2016;10:11–30.
    1. Mikyška A., Jurková M., Horák T., Slabý M. Study of the influence of hop polyphenols on the sensory stability of lager beer. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2022;248:533–542. doi: 10.1007/s00217-021-03900-0. - DOI
    1. Matsche B., Insa A.M., Wiesen E., Schönberger C., Krottenthaler M. The influence of yeast strains and hop varieties on the aroma of beer. Brew. Sci. 2018;71:31.
    1. Stanius Ž., Dūdėnas M., Kaškonienė V., Stankevičius M., Skrzydlewska E., Drevinskas T., Ragažinskiene O., Obelevičius K., Maruška A. Analysis of the Leaves and Cones of Lithuanian Hops (Humulus lupulus L.) Varieties by Chromatographic and Spectrophotometric Methods. Molecules. 2022;27:2705. doi: 10.3390/molecules27092705. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stokholm A., Van Simaeys K., Gallagher A., Weaver G., Shellhammer T.H. Investigating the Effect of Farm Management, Soil, and Climate on Hop Diastatic Potential. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2021;80:389–400. doi: 10.1080/03610470.2021.1977902. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources