Fractionation and Extraction Optimization of Potentially Valuable Compounds and Their Profiling in Six Varieties of Two Nicotiana Species
- PMID: 36432206
- PMCID: PMC9694777
- DOI: 10.3390/molecules27228105
Fractionation and Extraction Optimization of Potentially Valuable Compounds and Their Profiling in Six Varieties of Two Nicotiana Species
Abstract
There is an increasingly urgent call to shift industrial processes from fossil fuel feedstock to sustainable bio-based resources. This change becomes of high importance considering new budget requirements for a carbon-neutral economy. Such a transformation can be driven by traditionally used plants that are able to produce large amounts of valuable biologically relevant secondary metabolites. Tobacco plants can play a leading role in providing value-added products in remote areas of the world. In this study, we propose a non-exhaustive list of compounds with potential economic interest that can be sourced from the tobacco plant. In order to optimize extraction methodologies, we first analyzed their physico-chemical properties using rapid solubility tests and high-resolution microfractionation techniques. Next, to identify an optimal extraction for a selected list of compounds, we compared 13 different extraction method-solvent combinations. We proceeded with profiling some of these compounds in a total of six varieties from Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana rustica species, identifying the optimal variety for each. The estimated expected yields for each of these compounds demonstrate that tobacco plants can be a superior source of valuable compounds with diverse applications beyond nicotine. Among the most interesting results, we found high variability of anatabine content between species and varieties, ranging from 287 to 1699 µg/g. In addition, we found that CGA (1305 µg/g) and rutin (7910 µg/g) content are orders of magnitude lower in the Burley variety as compared to all others.
Keywords: Nicotiana rustica; Nicotiana tabacum; extraction; microfractionation; purification of plant compounds; valuable compound profiling.
Conflict of interest statement
C.L., K.K., M.F., A.B., W.S., P.A.G. and N.V.I. are employees of Philip Morris International. J.H. was an employee of Philip Morris International at the time the experiments were performed. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Winter J.C. Tobacco Use by Native North Americans: Sacred Smoke and Silent Killer. Volume 236 University of Oklahoma Press; Norman, OK, USA: 2000.
-
- Lamottke K., Ripoll C., Walczak R. The Roots of Innovation. Eur. Biopharm. Rev. 2011;15:52–56.
-
- Alan Rodgman T.A.P. The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2013. The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke.
-
- Nugroho L.H., Verpoorte R. Secondary metabolism in tobacco. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002;68:105–125. doi: 10.1023/A:1013853909494. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
