Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;14(3):267-273.
doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14744. Epub 2022 Nov 25.

Robot-assisted thymectomy in large anterior mediastinal tumors: A comparative study with video-assisted thymectomy and open surgery

Affiliations

Robot-assisted thymectomy in large anterior mediastinal tumors: A comparative study with video-assisted thymectomy and open surgery

Bin Jiang et al. Thorac Cancer. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted thymectomy (RAT) in large anterior mediastinal tumors (AMTs) (size ≥6 cm) compared with video-assisted thymectomy (VAT) and open surgery.

Methods: A total of 132 patients with large AMTs who underwent surgical resection from January 2016 to June 2022 were included in this study. A total of 61 patients underwent RAT, 36 patients underwent VAT and 35 patients underwent open surgery. Perioperative outcomes were compared.

Results: There were no significant differences in tumor size (p = 0.141), or pathological types (p = 0.903). Compared with the open group, the RAT and VAT groups were associated with a shorter operation time (115.00 vs. 160.00, p = 0.012; 122.50 vs. 160.00, p = 0.071), and less blood loss (50.00 vs. 200.00, p < 0.001; 50.00 vs. 200.00, p < 0.001), respectively. The rate of conversion in the RAT group was similar to that in the VAT group (6.56% vs. 13.89%, p = 0.229). Concomitant resection was less frequently performed in the VAT group than in the RAT and open groups (5.56% vs. 31.15%, p = 0.040; 5.56% vs. 31.43%, p = 0.006). VAT patients had a lower drainage volume (365.00 vs. 700.00 and 910.00 mL, p < 0.001), shorter duration of chest tube (2.00 vs. 3.00 and 4.00, p < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (5.00 vs. 6.00 and 7.00, p < 0.001) than the RAT and open groups. There was no 30-day mortality in any group. No difference was seen in R0 resection rates (p = 0.846). The postoperative complication rates were similar among the three groups (p = 0.309). Total in-hospital costs (66493.90 vs. 33581.05 and 42876.40, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the RAT group.

Conclusions: RAT is safe and effective for the resection of large AMTs compared to VAT and open surgery. Vascular resection in RAT is technically feasible. A long-term follow-up is required.

Keywords: anterior mediastinal tumor; robot-assisted thymectomy; video-assisted thymectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Robot‐assisted thymectomy via sub‐xiphoid approach for a large and advanced tumor combined resection of the innominate vein, partial superior vena cava (SVC) and lung. (a) The distal end of the innominate vein was exposed. (b) The distal end of the innominate vein was cut off with an endoscopic stapler. (c) Partial resection of the SVC with a stapler. (d) Sufficient diameter of the SVC. (e) Removal of the invaded lung. (f) Surgical field after complete resection of the tumor and invaded vital structures.

References

    1. Bacha EA, Chapelier AR, Macchiarini P, Fadel E, Dartevelle PG. Surgery for invasive primary mediastinal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:234–9. - PubMed
    1. Imielski B, Kurihara C, Manerikar A, Chaudhary S, Kosterski S, Odell D, et al. Comparative effectiveness and cost‐efficiency of surgical approaches for thymectomy. Surgery. 2020;168:737–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hess NR, Sarkaria IS, Pennathur A, Levy RM, Christie NA, Luketich JD. Minimally invasive versus open thymectomy: a systematic review of surgical techniques, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5:1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friedant AJ, Handorf EA, Su S, Scott WJ. Minimally invasive versus open thymectomy for thymic malignancies: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:30–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen C, Li J, Li J, Che G. Robot‐assisted thoracic surgery versus video‐assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of patients with thymoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Thorac Cancer. 2022;13:151–61. - PMC - PubMed